Comparison Overview

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office

VS

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office

None
Last Update: 2025-12-08
Between 650 and 699

The MPTF Office supports UN coherence and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals with a well-designed and professionally managed portfolio of innovative pooled financing instruments.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

19, avenue de la Paix, Geneva, Geneva, CH, 1202
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1863, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people affected by conflict and armed violence and to promote the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its mandate stems essentially from the Geneva Conventions of 1949. It takes action in response to emergencies and promotes respect for international humanitarian law and its implementation in national law. We work closely with National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and with their International Federation to ensure a concerted, rational and rapid humanitarian response to the needs of the victims of armed conflict or any other situation of internal violence. Find out more about the ICRC by visiting the following links: Where we work http://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work Working for the ICRC https://careers.icrc.org/ https://www.icrc.org/en/join-icrc-and-help-protect-lives-and-dignity Current Opportunities https://bit.ly/2GuHdZR

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12,925
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/un-multi-partner-trust-fund-office.jpeg
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC in 2025.

Incident History — UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/un-multi-partner-trust-fund-office.jpeg
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company has reported more cyber incidents than International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company.

UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company nor UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company nor UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company employs more people globally than UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H