Comparison Overview

Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions

VS

Kyocera Mita

Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions

3019 Alvin Devane Blvd., Austin, Texas, 78741, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ultimate-imaging.com

Ultimate Imaging was founded in 2003. Our staff has a collective 75 years experience in graphic design, printing and related services. We have talented Graphic Designers that can handle a printing job from the very beginning, including development and production of ideas and artwork of logos and other various marketing materials. Our hard-working, conscientious staff will handle your project with the utmost care throughout the entire production process from inception to printing, binding and mailing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kyocera Mita

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kyoceramita.com

Kyocera Mita is improving the document management processes of customers and making people's jobs easier through a high-performance, end-to-end digital imaging product line that delivers one of the industry's lowest total costs of ownership (TCO). The company manufactures and markets network-ready digital copiers/printers, laser printers, color copiers/printers, digital laser facsimiles, multi-functional, wide format imaging products and a portfolio of Kyocera Mita-developed and third-party software and network solutions. Kyocera Mita is a group company of Kyocera Corporation, the world's leading developer and manufacturer of advanced ceramics and associated products, including telecommunications equipment, semiconductor packages and electronic components. Kyocera Corporation's consolidated net revenues totaled $9.0 billion during the year ended March 31, 2003. Kyocera employs more than 40,000 people worldwide. Product Leadership Kyocera Mita innovates using technology to reduce TCO, streamline advanced document imaging tasks and protect the environment. Its environmental awareness is evidenced through the ECOSYS brand of printers. Unnecessary waste of cartridges is eliminated in ECOSYS products, since toner is added to the existing unit without disposal of the drum, a feature that not only helps protect the environment but contributes to a low TCO.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 355
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ultimate-imaging-print-solutions.jpeg
Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyocera-mita.jpeg
Kyocera Mita
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kyocera Mita
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kyocera Mita in 2025.

Incident History — Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kyocera Mita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyocera Mita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ultimate-imaging-print-solutions.jpeg
Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyocera-mita.jpeg
Kyocera Mita
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kyocera Mita company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kyocera Mita company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company.

In the current year, Kyocera Mita company and Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kyocera Mita company nor Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kyocera Mita company nor Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kyocera Mita company nor Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company nor Kyocera Mita company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company nor Kyocera Mita company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kyocera Mita company employs more people globally than Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ultimate Imaging Print Solutions nor Kyocera Mita holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References