Comparison Overview

Ulrich Museum of Art

VS

Science and Industry Museum

Ulrich Museum of Art

Wichita State University, Wichita, 67260-0046, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

As the region’s source for modern and contemporary art, the Ulrich Museum of Art, located on the campus of Wichita State University in Wichita, Kansas, provides a unique opportunity to view our world through the eyes of the leading artists of today. The museum seeks to expand human experience through encounters with the art of our time by developing and presenting an endless stream of groundbreaking exhibitions, prominent guest artists, art parties, fun family events, and compelling performances that explore today’s visual culture.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Science and Industry Museum

Liverpool Road, Manchester, undefined, M3 4FP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Science and Industry Museum in Manchester is devoted to inspiring our visitors through ideas that change the world, from the Industrial Revolution to today and beyond. It’s a story that we’re uniquely placed to tell—on the site of the oldest surviving passenger railway station, in the heart of the world’s first industrial city, today alive with innovative cutting-edge discoveries in science and technology. We care for a globally important heritage site comprising 5 listed buildings, two of them listed Grade 1. The museum site was the original terminus of the world’s first inter-city railway and our characteristic 1830 Warehouse epitomises Manchester’s 19th-century reputation as the warehouse of the western world. We combine the distinctive appeal of our historic site with a vibrant contemporary science programme, making connections between the past and the present, between scientific theory and real-world applications. One of the flagship events in our cultural calendar, bringing science to life for people of all ages, is the vibrant 11-day Manchester Science Festival which takes place across the city. Each October it attracts the best scientists from Manchester and beyond to showcase current research and promote the region’s rich heritage of innovation. The museum is part of the Science Museum Group, which encompasses the Science Museum, the National Railway Museum and the National Media Museum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mosi-museum-of-science-&-industry-.jpeg
Science and Industry Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ulrich Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Science and Industry Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ulrich Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Science and Industry Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Ulrich Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ulrich Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Science and Industry Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Science and Industry Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mosi-museum-of-science-&-industry-.jpeg
Science and Industry Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ulrich Museum of Art company and Science and Industry Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Science and Industry Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ulrich Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Science and Industry Museum company and Ulrich Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Science and Industry Museum company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Science and Industry Museum company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Science and Industry Museum company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Science and Industry Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Science and Industry Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Science and Industry Museum company employs more people globally than Ulrich Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Science and Industry Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H