Comparison Overview

Ulrich Museum of Art

VS

Historical Society of the New York Courts

Ulrich Museum of Art

Wichita State University, Wichita, 67260-0046, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

As the region’s source for modern and contemporary art, the Ulrich Museum of Art, located on the campus of Wichita State University in Wichita, Kansas, provides a unique opportunity to view our world through the eyes of the leading artists of today. The museum seeks to expand human experience through encounters with the art of our time by developing and presenting an endless stream of groundbreaking exhibitions, prominent guest artists, art parties, fun family events, and compelling performances that explore today’s visual culture.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Historical Society of the New York Courts

140 Grand Street, Suite 701, None, White Plains, New York, US, 10601
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Historical Society of the New York Courts was founded in 2002 by then New York State Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye. Its mission is to preserve, protect and promote the legal history of New York, including the proud heritage of its courts and the development of the Rule of Law. The Society promotes its mission through educational outreach to New York State students, and public programs and publications on these themes which inform our knowledge and role as citizens today. The Society supports its programs through contributions from its members, gifts and grants from foundations, corporations, law firms and individuals. The Society is recognized as a (501)(c)(3) organization by the Internal Revenue Service.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-the-ny-courts.jpeg
Historical Society of the New York Courts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ulrich Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historical Society of the New York Courts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ulrich Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historical Society of the New York Courts in 2026.

Incident History — Ulrich Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ulrich Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historical Society of the New York Courts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historical Society of the New York Courts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-the-ny-courts.jpeg
Historical Society of the New York Courts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ulrich Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historical Society of the New York Courts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historical Society of the New York Courts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ulrich Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Historical Society of the New York Courts company and Ulrich Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historical Society of the New York Courts company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Historical Society of the New York Courts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Historical Society of the New York Courts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ulrich Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Historical Society of the New York Courts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art nor Historical Society of the New York Courts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H