Comparison Overview

UK Regulators'​ Network

VS

Children First for Oregon

UK Regulators'​ Network

Civil Aviation Authority, Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Established in 2014, the UK Regulators Network (UKRN) continues to enable effective co-operation between regulators on important issues. With a credible culture of collaboration and learning, UKRN encourages greater efficiency and improved outcomes for consumers, businesses, and the economy, exploring cross-cutting issues and building better ways of working. For our latest news, please visit www.ukrn.org.uk To get in touch with us, please email: [email protected]

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Children First for Oregon

P.O. Box 14914, Portland, OR, 97293, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Children First for Oregon works to make Oregon a place where all children thrive. We educate and engage Oregonians to promote programs and policies that get results for kids. We are a trusted, independent voice for kids committed to providing opportunity for every Oregon child. We bring together parents, community leaders, business executives, and lawmakers to make smart investments in our state’s children. Through carefully researched reports, such as the annual Report Card and County Data Book, we raise awareness among all Oregonians of the importance of strong families and communities.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-regulators'-network.jpeg
UK Regulators'​ Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children-first-for-oregon.jpeg
Children First for Oregon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UK Regulators'​ Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children First for Oregon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UK Regulators'​ Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children First for Oregon in 2025.

Incident History — UK Regulators'​ Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Regulators'​ Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children First for Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children First for Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-regulators'-network.jpeg
UK Regulators'​ Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children-first-for-oregon.jpeg
Children First for Oregon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both UK Regulators'​ Network company and Children First for Oregon company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Children First for Oregon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UK Regulators'​ Network company.

In the current year, Children First for Oregon company and UK Regulators'​ Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children First for Oregon company nor UK Regulators'​ Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children First for Oregon company nor UK Regulators'​ Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children First for Oregon company nor UK Regulators'​ Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network company nor Children First for Oregon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network company nor Children First for Oregon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UK Regulators'​ Network company employs more people globally than Children First for Oregon company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UK Regulators'​ Network nor Children First for Oregon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H