Comparison Overview

Uitgeverij Lannoo

VS

Argumenty i Facty

Uitgeverij Lannoo

Kasteelstraat 97, Tielt, BE, 8700
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lannoo.be

Uitgeverij Lannoo nv heeft haar succes te danken aan jarenlange ervaring, creativiteit en een hecht team van gedreven medewerkers. Binnen de Uitgeverij Lannoo Groep, staat Lannoo Uitgeverij in voor de ontwikkeling van meer dan 600 boeken per jaar, in diverse genres en is distributeur voor belangrijke nationale en internationale uitgevers. Naast het hoofdkantoor in Tielt zijn er ook vestigingen in Leuven (LannooCampus), Brussel (Racine) en in Nederland, te Houten (LannooCampus Nederland). Daarnaast maken de uitgeverijen Meulenhoff Boekerij bv (Amsterdam), Unieboek | Het Spectrum bv (Houten) en Terra Lannoo (Houten) ook deel uit van de Uitgeverij Lannoo Groep. Lannoo Uitgeverij (Tielt) wil synoniem zijn voor kwaliteit en kiest doelbewust voor een upmarket positionering door het publiceren van uitgaven van een hoge kwaliteit, zowel naar vorm als inhoud. Met deze keuze willen wij ook invulling geven aan onze culturele opdracht. Dat betekent tezelfdertijd ook dat we moeilijke genres, die slechts een kleiner publiek kunnen bereiken, een plaats blijven geven. Lannoo Uitgeverij wil ‘boeken voor het leven’ publiceren die ook een emotionele meerwaarde bieden.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Argumenty i Facty

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.aif.ru

«Argumenty i Fakty» («AiF») is the largest and most popular weekly publication in Russia and leads the Russian press abroad. «AiF» has 32-64 pages in the Russian language. The precise make-up of the newspaper varies according to region and includes; the main newspaper body with regional supplements and articles drawn from our world-wide correspondent network and representative offices abroad. The newspaper reaches readers of all ages and income levels among them: politicians, businessmen, technicians, office workers and home-makers. «AiF» has won many Russian and international awards, and it continues to top readers polls run by the most influential media analyst organisations. In 1990 «Argumenty i Fakty» was listed in the Guinness Book of Records with the largest circulation of any weekly publication, at 33 400 000 copies worldwide. «Argumenty i Fakty» weekly has become a leading information source for both Russian speakers abroad and those with an interest in Russian culture and news and is well known in the CIS states, USA, Canada, Australia, Israel and throughout Europe.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverijlannoo.jpeg
Uitgeverij Lannoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argumenty-i-facty.jpeg
Argumenty i Facty
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Uitgeverij Lannoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Argumenty i Facty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Uitgeverij Lannoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Argumenty i Facty in 2025.

Incident History — Uitgeverij Lannoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Uitgeverij Lannoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Argumenty i Facty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Argumenty i Facty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverijlannoo.jpeg
Uitgeverij Lannoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argumenty-i-facty.jpeg
Argumenty i Facty
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Argumenty i Facty company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Uitgeverij Lannoo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Argumenty i Facty company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Uitgeverij Lannoo company.

In the current year, Argumenty i Facty company and Uitgeverij Lannoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Argumenty i Facty company nor Uitgeverij Lannoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Argumenty i Facty company nor Uitgeverij Lannoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Argumenty i Facty company nor Uitgeverij Lannoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo company nor Argumenty i Facty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo company nor Argumenty i Facty company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Uitgeverij Lannoo company employs more people globally than Argumenty i Facty company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Lannoo nor Argumenty i Facty holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References