Comparison Overview

Uitgeverij Verhagen

VS

LEFAIR Magazine

Uitgeverij Verhagen

Ambachtsweg 7a, Katwijk aan de Rijn, 2222 AH, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21

De kranten van Uitgeverij Verhagen dringen door tot in haarvaten van de samenleving in de Duin- en Bollenstreek. Wij vinden dat iedere gemeente zijn eigen nieuws verdient, onze redacties zijn de luis in de pels en spreken de inwoners aan met een krant die speciaal voor hen is geschreven. Naast de actualiteiten en het laatste nieuws besteden wij o.a. aandacht aan sport, cultuur en politiek en is er ruimte voor verdieping in “hot topics” en de laatste trends. Onze kranten hebben een grote betrokkenheid met de samenleving, niet voor niets is ons credo “lokaal, betrokken en betrouwbaar”.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LEFAIR Magazine

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, 91601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

LEFAIR Magazine brings to its readers current and future trends and news in fashion, beauty, health, lifestyle, travel and entertainment. We feature live web links in all of our editorial stories and advertising to allow for easy online shopping. We inspire, excite, inform and entertain with sexy, compelling and powerful photo and video content created by some of the industry’s most talented artists and influencers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-verhagen.jpeg
Uitgeverij Verhagen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefair-magazine.jpeg
LEFAIR Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Uitgeverij Verhagen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LEFAIR Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Uitgeverij Verhagen in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LEFAIR Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Uitgeverij Verhagen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Uitgeverij Verhagen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LEFAIR Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LEFAIR Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uitgeverij-verhagen.jpeg
Uitgeverij Verhagen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lefair-magazine.jpeg
LEFAIR Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Uitgeverij Verhagen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LEFAIR Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LEFAIR Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Uitgeverij Verhagen company.

In the current year, LEFAIR Magazine company and Uitgeverij Verhagen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LEFAIR Magazine company nor Uitgeverij Verhagen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LEFAIR Magazine company nor Uitgeverij Verhagen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LEFAIR Magazine company nor Uitgeverij Verhagen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen company nor LEFAIR Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen company nor LEFAIR Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Uitgeverij Verhagen company employs more people globally than LEFAIR Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Uitgeverij Verhagen nor LEFAIR Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.