Comparison Overview

United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc.

VS

Success Rehabilitation

United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc.

None, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30315
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

United Healthcare System of Georgia Inc. (UHSG) is a non-profit medical consortium committed to improving healthcare accessibility for undeserved communities across the State of Georgia. Our comprehensive approach encompasses various services aimed at addressing the diverse needs of these communities. UHSG currently has well over 1200 healthcare providers, which consist of 300 doctors, 400 nurses, 400 educators and a host of support staff members. In addition, we have 800 interpreters that speak over 250 languages and dialects to handle the language barriers. We also have four (4) nursing homes and a host of others to be added in the years to come. Through a combination of medical transportation, care coordination, behavioral health and substance abuse services, clinical support, engagement in clinical trials, and education. We strive to bridge the gap in healthcare access and deliver high-quality care to those who are in need in the State of Georgia.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Success Rehabilitation

5666 Clymer Rd, Quakertown, 18951, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

At Success Rehabilitation, now featuring our newest divisions, Community Skills Program® and Acadia NeuroRehab, we take pride in being a leading provider of post-acute brain rehabilitation programs and services. Spanning the continuum of post-acute care in brain injury rehabilitation, our comprehensive programs ensure an individualized and multidisciplinary team approach to rehabilitation - from Residential and Neuro Rehabilitation Outpatient Services to Home- and Community-Based Services.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uhcsga.jpeg
United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/success-rehabilitation.jpeg
Success Rehabilitation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Success Rehabilitation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Success Rehabilitation in 2025.

Incident History — United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Success Rehabilitation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Success Rehabilitation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uhcsga.jpeg
United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/success-rehabilitation.jpeg
Success Rehabilitation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Success Rehabilitation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Success Rehabilitation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company.

In the current year, Success Rehabilitation company and United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Success Rehabilitation company nor United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Success Rehabilitation company nor United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Success Rehabilitation company nor United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company nor Success Rehabilitation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company nor Success Rehabilitation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Success Rehabilitation company employs more people globally than United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Healthcare System Of Georgia, Inc. nor Success Rehabilitation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H