Comparison Overview

University of Florida

VS

Rutgers University

University of Florida

355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://UF.edu

University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of established programs in international education, research and service. It was founded in 1853 and is based in Gainesville, Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,956
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rutgers University

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, NJ, US, 08901
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rutgers.edu

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in three New Jersey cities, and our footprint can be seen around the region. We’re an academic, health, and research powerhouse and a university of opportunity.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 18,207
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgersu.jpeg
Rutgers University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rutgers University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rutgers University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgersu.jpeg
Rutgers University
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rutgers University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rutgers University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Florida company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rutgers University company and University of Florida company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rutgers University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rutgers University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rutgers University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Florida company nor Rutgers University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rutgers University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Florida company.

University of Florida company employs more people globally than Rutgers University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Florida nor Rutgers University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References