Comparison Overview

University of Florida

VS

McGill University

University of Florida

355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of established programs in international education, research and service. It was founded in 1853 and is based in Gainesville, Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,956
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McGill University

845 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Qc, CA, H3A 2T5
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

McGill University is one of Canada's best-known institutions of higher learning and one of the leading universities in the world. With students coming to McGill from some 150 countries, our student body is the most internationally diverse of any research-intensive university in the country. McGill was founded in 1821 thanks to a generous bequest by James McGill, and since then, we've grown from a small college to a bustling university with three campuses, 11 faculties, some 300 programs of study, and more than 37,500 students. The University also partners with four affiliated teaching hospitals to graduate over 1,000 health care professionals each year. The goal of McGill University's social media platforms is to strengthen our community, which includes students, faculty, and alumni. The aim is to provide information on events, campus news and promote networking. McGill University fosters freedom of expression, while valuing respect and collegiality. We encourage respectful dialogue and reserve the right to remove the following: Comments deemed offensive, vulgar or profane; comments off-topic and/or unrelated to posted content; content that infringes on an individual's privacy or copyright.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,079
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcgill-university.jpeg
McGill University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McGill University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McGill University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McGill University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McGill University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcgill-university.jpeg
McGill University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McGill University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McGill University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Florida company.

In the current year, McGill University company and University of Florida company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McGill University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McGill University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McGill University company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Florida company nor McGill University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

McGill University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Florida company.

University of Florida company employs more people globally than McGill University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Florida nor McGill University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.