Comparison Overview

UC San Diego

VS

Arizona State University

UC San Diego

9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, US, 92093
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://http://ucsd.edu

Recognized as one of the top 15 research universities worldwide, our culture of collaboration sparks discoveries that advance society and drive economic impact. Everything we do is dedicated to ensuring our students have the opportunity to become changemakers, equipped with the multidisciplinary tools needed to accelerate answers to our world’s most pressing issues.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,735
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Arizona State University

1151 S Forest Ave, Tempe, AZ, US, 85281
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 800 and 849
http://www.asu.edu/

ASU has developed a new model for the American research university, creating an institution committed to excellence, access and impact — the New American University. Nationally and internationally acclaimed, ASU ranks among the very best in nearly every critical measurement of student success, outcomes of groundbreaking research and impact in the communities it serves. ASU is among the top 1% of universities in the world, has been repeatedly ranked No. 1 in multiple categories and is currently ranked No. 2 in the U.S. for employability among public universities. ASU is home to a vibrant, thriving global network of alumni — leaders, doers, shapers and learners, and serves graduate and undergraduate students across four Phoenix Metropolitan area campuses, online and throughout the U.S., including locations in California, Hawai‘i and Washington, D.C. Follow our page for the latest stories and updates from ASU.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 29,925
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsandiego.jpeg
UC San Diego
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-state-university.jpeg
Arizona State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UC San Diego
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arizona State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC San Diego in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arizona State University in 2026.

Incident History — UC San Diego (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC San Diego cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arizona State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arizona State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsandiego.jpeg
UC San Diego
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-state-university.jpeg
Arizona State University
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Arizona State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UC San Diego company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UC San Diego company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Arizona State University company.

In the current year, Arizona State University company and UC San Diego company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UC San Diego company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Arizona State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Arizona State University company and UC San Diego company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Arizona State University company nor UC San Diego company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UC San Diego company nor Arizona State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UC San Diego company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arizona State University company.

Arizona State University company employs more people globally than UC San Diego company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UC San Diego nor Arizona State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References