Comparison Overview

UCLA

VS

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

UCLA

405 Hilgard Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1405, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ucla.edu

UCLA offers a combination that’s rare, especially among public research universities. The breadth, depth and inspired excellence among academic programs—from the visual and performing arts to the humanities, social sciences, STEM disciplines and health sciences—add up to endless opportunity. The location is unmatched: a campus that is unexpectedly picturesque and compact, set in a thriving and diverse global city.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 28,633
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
3
View Profile

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

14th and R St, Lincoln, NE, 68588, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://unl.edu

The University of Nebraska-Lincoln is the state’s flagship university and the intellectual center of the state of Nebraska. Like the university’s founders in 1869, students and faculty at Nebraska look challenges and opportunities in the eye, using fresh thinking and creativity to forge new paths. Our state’s expansive geography fosters a closeness and collaboration that makes way for solutions applied at home and around the world. This includes innovative public-private partnerships and a new research campus – Nebraska Innovation Campus – where business partners connect with faculty talent to transform ideas into innovations. Nebraska continues to grow in size and prominence. It welcomed its largest and most diverse incoming class in 2017 and ranked in the Top 10 of Springer Nature’s international list of Rising Stars in scientific research in 2016. The university has more than 26,000 students and more than 150 undergraduate and 135 graduate degree programs and is ranked as a best-value university by The Princeton Review, and the Fiske Guide to Colleges has repeatedly singled out the university for its academic strength and affordability. A top-tier research institution and member of the Big Ten Academic Alliance, Nebraska is a leader among the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities and is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. As a pioneer in teaching and research, Nebraska leads an array of projects aimed at broadening knowledge and bettering lives around the world. In 2017, the Milken Institute ranked the university among the nation’s elite for its ability to drive economic growth by commercializing the work of its faculty. Optimism abounds at Nebraska, creating a spirit that breaks through conventions and tells the world that we are in the middle of everywhere. Community Guidelines: go.unl.edu/smcg

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,381
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucla.jpeg
UCLA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska-lincoln.jpeg
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UCLA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCLA in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2025.

Incident History — UCLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Nebraska-Lincoln (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Nebraska-Lincoln cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucla.jpeg
UCLA
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska-lincoln.jpeg
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Nebraska-Lincoln company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UCLA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCLA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Nebraska-Lincoln company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Nebraska-Lincoln company and UCLA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UCLA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Nebraska-Lincoln company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UCLA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other University of Nebraska-Lincoln company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Nebraska-Lincoln company nor UCLA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UCLA company nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UCLA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Nebraska-Lincoln company.

UCLA company employs more people globally than University of Nebraska-Lincoln company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UCLA nor University of Nebraska-Lincoln holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References