Comparison Overview

UCHealth

VS

Apollo Hospitals

UCHealth

12401 E. 17th Avenue, Human Resources, Aurora, CO, US, 80045
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uchealth.org

At UCHealth, we do things differently. We strive to promote individual and community health and leave no question unanswered along the way. We’re driven to improve and optimize health care. Our network of nationally-recognized hospitals, clinic locations and health care providers extends throughout Colorado, southern Wyoming and western Nebraska. We deliver excellent care close to home, no matter where you might live. Our success is defined by more than our patient volumes or treatment outcomes. It’s about building a team of exceptional people, from our clinical staff to our expert physicians, who consistently do what is right for the individuals we are honored to serve. UCHealth, a 501(c) (3) health system, was formed in 2012 to increase access to innovative and advanced patient care, realize supply chain and IT efficiencies, and to better serve patients throughout the Rocky Mountain region by combining academic-based and community-focused medicine. Together, the clinics and hospitals within UCHealth can offer the most advanced treatments to improve the lives of patients and their families in Colorado and beyond.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 22,518
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Apollo Hospitals

21, Greams Lane,, Off Greams Road,, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN, 600006
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.apollohospitals.com

Driven by the vision of its Chairman, Dr. Prathap C. Reddy, the Apollo Hospitals Group pioneered corporate healthcare in India. Apollo revolutionized healthcare when Dr Prathap Reddy opened the first hospital in Chennai in 1983. Today Apollo is the world’s largest integrated healthcare platform with over 10,000 beds across 73 hospitals, over 6000 pharmacies and over 2500 clinics and diagnostic centers as well as 500+ telemedicine centers. Since its inception, Apollo has emerged as one of the world's premier cardiac centers, having conducted over 300,000+ angioplasties and 200,000+ surgeries. Apollo continues to invest in research to bring the most cutting-edge technologies, equipment and treatment protocols to ensure patients have the best available care in the world. Apollo’s 100,000 family members are dedicated to bringing you the best care and leaving the world better than we found it.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 36,382
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uchealth.jpeg
UCHealth
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theapollohospitals.jpeg
Apollo Hospitals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UCHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apollo Hospitals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCHealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Apollo Hospitals has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — UCHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Apollo Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apollo Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uchealth.jpeg
UCHealth
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Diligent Software
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theapollohospitals.jpeg
Apollo Hospitals
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS, API Vulnerabilities, Employee Credential Theft, System Exploits, Cloud Attacks
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Disruption of Services, Espionage (Potential)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Apollo Hospitals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UCHealth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCHealth and Apollo Hospitals have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Apollo Hospitals company has reported more cyber incidents than UCHealth company.

Neither Apollo Hospitals company nor UCHealth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UCHealth company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Apollo Hospitals company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apollo Hospitals company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UCHealth company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UCHealth company nor Apollo Hospitals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Apollo Hospitals company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UCHealth company.

Apollo Hospitals company employs more people globally than UCHealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UCHealth nor Apollo Hospitals holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References