Comparison Overview

UCI Health

VS

Ramsay Santé

UCI Health

101 The City Dr S, None, Orange, California, US, 92868
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

UCI Health is committed to providing the highest quality healthcare to Orange County and surrounding communities through its world-class physicians, surgeons and clinical staff. UCI Health is the clinical enterprise of the University of California, Irvine. UC Irvine Medical Center, the main campus in Orange, California, features Orange County’s only National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, high-risk perinatal/neonatal program, Level I trauma center and Level II pediatric trauma center. It is the primary teaching hospital for UCI School of Medicine. Learn more about UCI Health: ucihealth.org Job information: ucihealth.org/careers Volunteer information: ucihealth.org/volunteer

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 5,148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Ramsay Santé

39, rue Mstislav Rostropovitch Paris Cedex 17, Île-de-France CS60053 75850, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

After the acquisition of the Capio Group in 2018, Ramsay Santé has become Europe's leading private hospital and primary care companies. The group now has 36,000 employees and works with nearly 8,600 private practitioners. Present in 5 countries, France, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Italy, the group treats more than 7 million patients per year in its 350 establishments. In hospitalization, Ramsay Santé offers almost all medical and surgical treatments in three business lines: Medicine-Surgery-Obstetrics (MCO), Follow-up and Rehabilitation Care (SSR) and Mental Health. Wherever it is present, the group participates in public health service missions and in the health network of the country, as in Sweden where the group has more than a hundred local health centres. The quality and safety of care is the group's priority in all the countries where it operates. This is why the group is today one of the references in modern medicine, especially in ambulatory surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ARS). The group also invests more than €200 million every year in its establishments, whether in new surgical and imaging technologies, or in the construction and modernisation of establishments. It also innovates at the service of patients with new digital tools and by developing its organisations to improve the efficiency of care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uc-irvine-medical-center.jpeg
UCI Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ramsaysante.jpeg
Ramsay Santé
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UCI Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ramsay Santé
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCI Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ramsay Santé in 2025.

Incident History — UCI Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCI Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ramsay Santé (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ramsay Santé cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uc-irvine-medical-center.jpeg
UCI Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Unethical Behavior
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Keystroke Logger (Malware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2011
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Access Abuse
Motivation: Unknown (Potentially Unauthorized Curiosity or Malicious Intent)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ramsaysante.jpeg
Ramsay Santé
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ramsay Santé company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UCI Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCI Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ramsay Santé company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ramsay Santé company and UCI Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ramsay Santé company nor UCI Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UCI Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ramsay Santé company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ramsay Santé company nor UCI Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UCI Health company nor Ramsay Santé company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ramsay Santé company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UCI Health company.

Ramsay Santé company employs more people globally than UCI Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UCI Health nor Ramsay Santé holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H