Comparison Overview

Ubisoft

VS

Epic Games

Ubisoft

2, Avenue Pasteur, Saint-Mandé, Île-de-France, FR, 94160
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 600 and 649

Ubisoft is a global leader in gaming with teams across the world crafting original and memorable gaming experiences featuring brands such as Assassin’s Creed®, Brawlhalla®, For Honor®, Far Cry®, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon®, Just Dance®, Rabbids®, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six®, The Crew® and Tom Clancy’s The Division®. We believe diverse perspectives help both players and teams thrive. If you’re passionate about innovation and pushing entertainment boundaries, join our journey and help us create the unknown!

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18,483
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Epic Games

Cary, NC, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1991, Epic Games is a leading interactive entertainment company and provider of 3D engine technology. Epic operates Fortnite, one of the world’s largest games with over 350 million accounts and 2.5 billion friend connections. Epic also develops Unreal Engine, which powers the world’s leading games and is adopted across industries such as film and television, architecture, automotive, manufacturing, and simulation. Through Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, and Epic Online Services, Epic provides an end-to-end digital ecosystem for developers and creators to build, distribute, and operate games and other content. Epic has over 40 offices worldwide with headquarters in Cary, North Carolina.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,599
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic-games.jpeg
Epic Games
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ubisoft
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epic Games
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

Ubisoft has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

Epic Games has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ubisoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ubisoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epic Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubisoft.jpeg
Ubisoft
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial extortion via data theft and public release threats
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic-games.jpeg
Epic Games
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Political Motivations
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2016
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Epic Games company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ubisoft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ubisoft and Epic Games have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Epic Games and Ubisoft have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Ubisoft company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Epic Games company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Epic Games company and Ubisoft company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both Epic Games company and Ubisoft company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Ubisoft company nor Epic Games company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Epic Games company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ubisoft company.

Ubisoft company employs more people globally than Epic Games company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Games.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ubisoft nor Epic Games holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N