Comparison Overview

UberPrints

VS

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

UberPrints

115 Ruth Dr, Athens, GA, 30601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Launched in 2005, UberPrints.com is a self-serve custom apparel website offering awesome tees and killer service to customers nationwide. With offices in Atlanta and Athens, GA, we're growing fast -- come join the UberCrew and help us spread the love one t-shirt at a time! Our online design studio makes it easy to personalize tees, tanks, polos, hoodies, kid's apparel and more. Choose from hundreds of fonts, colors and unique apparel styles to create completely custom clothing! Ready to see what Uber's all about? Get started at http://www.uberprints.com/!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

5651 Kimball Ct, Chino, California, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

At M&M Printed Bag, Inc. our Plastic Bags product line is diverse and designed to meet the specific needs of various sectors. In addition to our standard plastic bags, we also provide specialty bags tailored to specific industry needs. These include anti-static bags, tamper-evident bags, biohazard bags, and more. These specialized bags are designed to address unique packaging challenges and ensure the safety and security of the contents.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uberprints-com.jpeg
UberPrints
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UberPrints
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UberPrints in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printed Bag, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — UberPrints (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UberPrints cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uberprints-com.jpeg
UberPrints
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UberPrints company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UberPrints company.

In the current year, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company and UberPrints company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor UberPrints company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor UberPrints company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor UberPrints company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UberPrints company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UberPrints company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UberPrints company employs more people globally than M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UberPrints nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N