Comparison Overview

U.S. Chrome Corporation

VS

Hidrostal UK

U.S. Chrome Corporation

175 Garfield Ave, Stratford, Connecticut, 06615, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uschrome.com

Since 1940, U.S. Chrome has been defining quality, precision, and innovation in the plating industry. We built our reputation on hard chrome plating with regional production plants throughout the US. We expanded our capabilities exponentially by investing in a state-of-the-art research and development laboratory where we have developed everything from special-purpose coatings to environmentally-friendly replacements for chromium. Let us address your highly specific needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hidrostal UK

Unit 1 Stadium Park, Castleford, West Yorkshire, WF10 5PZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hidrostal.com

Hidrostal Ltd is one of the UK’s leading designers and suppliers of pumping solutions into the water and industrial markets. Hidrostal has deployed thousands of pumping systems and fully understand our clients'​ needs and the technical requirements involved. We are well-known for the quality of our workmanship and our high level of technical ability, and we are justly proud of our well-earned reputation for providing innovative and cost effective pumping solutions for challenging applications.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-chrome-corporation.jpeg
U.S. Chrome Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hidrostal-ltd.jpeg
Hidrostal UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. Chrome Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hidrostal UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Chrome Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hidrostal UK in 2025.

Incident History — U.S. Chrome Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Chrome Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hidrostal UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hidrostal UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-chrome-corporation.jpeg
U.S. Chrome Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hidrostal-ltd.jpeg
Hidrostal UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

U.S. Chrome Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hidrostal UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hidrostal UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to U.S. Chrome Corporation company.

In the current year, Hidrostal UK company and U.S. Chrome Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hidrostal UK company nor U.S. Chrome Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hidrostal UK company nor U.S. Chrome Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hidrostal UK company nor U.S. Chrome Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation company nor Hidrostal UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hidrostal UK company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Chrome Corporation company.

Hidrostal UK company employs more people globally than U.S. Chrome Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. Chrome Corporation nor Hidrostal UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References