Comparison Overview

Two Horizons Press

VS

Radish Fiction

Two Horizons Press

Last Update: 2025-11-22

Two Horizons Press is an international publishing company focused on providing quality educational literature to groups traditionally neglected by other publishers. Two Horizons publishes children’s literature, handbooks for parents and educators, and reprints of classic works in history, philosophy and educational pedagogy. Our mission is to provide disadvantaged groups with books that are practical, informative, empowering, and sensitive to the specific needs of the communities they address.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Radish Fiction

New York City, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Launched in February 2015, Radish is Netflix for serials where readers can enjoy premium serialiased stories based on bite-sized episodes suitable for 10 minutes on a smartphone. It is a digital update of the Victorian idea of the serialised novel. After 3 free chapters, mobile micropayments provide access to ensuing episodes so that audiences may secure instant gratification after a cliffhanger ending. Its top author is earning more than $43,000 a month. Radish has been covered in leading publications such as New York Times, Publishers Weekly, Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Techcrunch, Fast Company, and Forbes. With support from Silicon Valley, Hollywood and the publishing industry, Radish has raised $5 million in seed financing. The backers include Greylock, Lowercase Partners, Softbank Next Media Innovation Fund, UTA, Bertelsmann Digital Media Investments (BDMI) and Sherpa Capital. Individual investors include bestselling author Amy Tan, Sir Peter Bazalgette, Charlie Songhurst, Nicolas Berggruen, Matt Humphrey, Duncan Clark, and Jeremy Yap among others. Ankur Jain, VP of Product at Tinder, is on the board.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-horizons-press.jpeg
Two Horizons Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radish-fiction.jpeg
Radish Fiction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Two Horizons Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Radish Fiction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Two Horizons Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radish Fiction in 2025.

Incident History — Two Horizons Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Two Horizons Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Radish Fiction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radish Fiction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-horizons-press.jpeg
Two Horizons Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/radish-fiction.jpeg
Radish Fiction
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Two Horizons Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Radish Fiction company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Radish Fiction company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Two Horizons Press company.

In the current year, Radish Fiction company and Two Horizons Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Radish Fiction company nor Two Horizons Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Radish Fiction company nor Two Horizons Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Radish Fiction company nor Two Horizons Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Two Horizons Press company nor Radish Fiction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Two Horizons Press company nor Radish Fiction company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Radish Fiction company employs more people globally than Two Horizons Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Two Horizons Press nor Radish Fiction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.