Comparison Overview

two*

VS

Q+E Design Source

two*

500 Davis Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We’re two; a One Workplace venture. Two is built with the spirit of collaboration, two brings brands and cultures to life by creating smart furniture solutions for creatively minded companies. At two, we like to double down on fun, great design, and flawless execution. And we’ve assembled a team of experts who love what they do and know how to take a great design vision and bring it to life.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Q+E Design Source

undefined, Denver, CO, 80238, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Commercial Interior Design and Furniture Solutions Provider. At Q+E Design Source we pride ourselves on close teamwork and constant communication. Our goal is to complete projects within budget, on schedule, achieving the highest degree of customer satisfaction, making you feel like our only customer! Services: Furniture Sourcing, Space Planning, Reconfiguration, Refurbishment, Move Management, Liquidation, Inventory, Furniture Standards, Furniture Re-purposing

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/q-e-design-source-inc.jpeg
Q+E Design Source
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
two*
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Q+E Design Source
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for two* in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Q+E Design Source in 2025.

Incident History — two* (X = Date, Y = Severity)

two* cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Q+E Design Source (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Q+E Design Source cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/q-e-design-source-inc.jpeg
Q+E Design Source
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Q+E Design Source company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to two* company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Q+E Design Source company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to two* company.

In the current year, Q+E Design Source company and two* company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Q+E Design Source company nor two* company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Q+E Design Source company nor two* company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Q+E Design Source company nor two* company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither two* company nor Q+E Design Source company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither two* company nor Q+E Design Source company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

two* company employs more people globally than Q+E Design Source company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds HIPAA certification.

Neither two* nor Q+E Design Source holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.