Comparison Overview

two*

VS

Geek Chic

two*

500 Davis Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.twofurnish.com

We’re two; a One Workplace venture. Two is built with the spirit of collaboration, two brings brands and cultures to life by creating smart furniture solutions for creatively minded companies. At two, we like to double down on fun, great design, and flawless execution. And we’ve assembled a team of experts who love what they do and know how to take a great design vision and bring it to life.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Geek Chic

711 100th St SE, Everett, 98208-3727, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://geekchichq.com

Geek Chic has been making lifestyle furniture for geeks since 2008-- starting with gaming tables, and expanding into other geek needs like comic storage, collectibles display, and office retrofitting. Each heirloom quality piece is handcrafted by a small team of dedicated woodworkers in a shop just north of Seattle, WA. True to their name, Geek Chic aims to design, shape, and elevate the geek praxis.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
two*
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Geek Chic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for two* in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geek Chic in 2025.

Incident History — two* (X = Date, Y = Severity)

two* cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Geek Chic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geek Chic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geek-chic.jpeg
Geek Chic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Geek Chic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to two* company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Geek Chic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to two* company.

In the current year, Geek Chic company and two* company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Geek Chic company nor two* company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor two* company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Geek Chic company nor two* company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither two* company nor Geek Chic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither two* company nor Geek Chic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

two* company employs more people globally than Geek Chic company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither two* nor Geek Chic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References