Comparison Overview

Twin Lakes Library | MGRL

VS

Cass County Public Library

Twin Lakes Library | MGRL

151 S Jefferson ST SE, Milledgeville, GA, 31061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Twin Lakes Library | Middle Georgia Regional Library Serving Milledgeville, Baldwin County, Georgia with three locations: --Mary Vinson Memorial Library --Lake Sinclair Library --Hancock Branch Our libraries are part of the PINES member library system Middle Georgia Regional Library (MGRL) serving all of Middle Georgia including: --Bibb County --Crawford County --Jones County --Macon County --Twin Lakes/Baldwin County --Twiggs County --Wilkinson County Visit the our regional website @ https://bibblib.org

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cass County Public Library

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A public library district serving Cass County, Missouri with branches in Belton, Harrisonville, Pleasant Hill, Archie, Garden City, and Drexel. The library also operates a Genealogy Branch in Harrisonville and a Bookmobile. Our mission is to provide informational, educational, and enrichment services and resources to the community through a comprehensive and efficient library system.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/twin-lakes-library-system.jpeg
Twin Lakes Library | MGRL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cass-county-public-library.jpeg
Cass County Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Twin Lakes Library | MGRL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cass County Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Twin Lakes Library | MGRL in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cass County Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Twin Lakes Library | MGRL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Twin Lakes Library | MGRL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cass County Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cass County Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/twin-lakes-library-system.jpeg
Twin Lakes Library | MGRL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cass-county-public-library.jpeg
Cass County Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cass County Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cass County Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company.

In the current year, Cass County Public Library company and Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cass County Public Library company nor Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cass County Public Library company nor Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cass County Public Library company nor Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company nor Cass County Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company nor Cass County Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cass County Public Library company employs more people globally than Twin Lakes Library | MGRL company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Twin Lakes Library | MGRL nor Cass County Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H