Comparison Overview

Tusk Strategies

VS

The Police Foundation (UK)

Tusk Strategies

251 Park Ave S, New York, 10010, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Tusk Strategies is a 35-person team of some of the most talented and tenacious political, communications, and policy strategists in the country. For over a decade, we have worked with leading startups, established companies, and organizations willing to think creatively and challenge the status quo. Our teams take on and win complex multi-jurisdictional regulatory campaigns, pass groundbreaking laws, direct communications efforts that breakthrough the noise, and grow client businesses through unique partnerships and events. We're who you hire when winning is the only option. Every day we speak to new companies and organizations looking to engage in the political arena. Get in touch on LinkedIn with any of our team members or head to our website to learn more and reach out.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Police Foundation (UK)

124 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Police Foundation is the only independent think tank focused exclusively on improving policing and developing knowledge and understanding of policing and crime reduction. Our mission is to generate evidence and develop ideas that deliver better policing and a safer society. We do this by producing trusted, impartial research and by working with the police and their partners to create change. The Police Foundation recently hosted the independent Strategic Review of Policing in England and Wales, chaired by Sir Michael Barber, which sets a long term strategic direction for a police service capable of meeting the challenges of the 21st century. See https://www.policingreview.org.uk/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tusk-strategies.jpeg
Tusk Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-police-foundation.jpeg
The Police Foundation (UK)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tusk Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Police Foundation (UK)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tusk Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Police Foundation (UK) in 2025.

Incident History — Tusk Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tusk Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Police Foundation (UK) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Police Foundation (UK) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tusk-strategies.jpeg
Tusk Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-police-foundation.jpeg
The Police Foundation (UK)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tusk Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Police Foundation (UK) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Police Foundation (UK) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tusk Strategies company.

In the current year, The Police Foundation (UK) company and Tusk Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Police Foundation (UK) company nor Tusk Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Police Foundation (UK) company nor Tusk Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Police Foundation (UK) company nor Tusk Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tusk Strategies company nor The Police Foundation (UK) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tusk Strategies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Police Foundation (UK) company.

Tusk Strategies company employs more people globally than The Police Foundation (UK) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tusk Strategies nor The Police Foundation (UK) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H