Comparison Overview

Tuscany Suites & Casino

VS

Gem Casino Travel, LLC

Tuscany Suites & Casino

255 east flamingo road, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89169, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Discover the pleasures of our all-suites Las Vegas Resort. Tuscany Suites & Casino features the best in spacious hotel accommodations, award-winning dining, exciting casino gaming, and a variety of live entertainment. Experience the excitement of all Las Vegas has to offer in a prime location, just two blocks away from the famous Las Vegas Strip and minutes away from the Las Vegas Convention Center and McCarran International Airport.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gem Casino Travel, LLC

US, 08232
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As licensed independent casino representatives for premiere casino resorts all over the world, Gem Casino Travel, LLC is focused on making your casino excursions as wonderful and memorable as we possibly can. We act as a full-service liaison between premiere gaming resorts and new and established blackjack, craps/dice, slots and poker players. We're here to assist you with making reservations, travel arrangements, opening lines of credit, and providing detailed information on promotional player's rates and specials for each luxury destination.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuscany-suites-&-casino.jpeg
Tuscany Suites & Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gem Casino Travel, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tuscany Suites & Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gem Casino Travel, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tuscany Suites & Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gem Casino Travel, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Tuscany Suites & Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tuscany Suites & Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gem Casino Travel, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gem Casino Travel, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuscany-suites-&-casino.jpeg
Tuscany Suites & Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gem Casino Travel, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tuscany Suites & Casino company and Gem Casino Travel, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Gem Casino Travel, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tuscany Suites & Casino company.

In the current year, Gem Casino Travel, LLC company and Tuscany Suites & Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gem Casino Travel, LLC company nor Tuscany Suites & Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gem Casino Travel, LLC company nor Tuscany Suites & Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gem Casino Travel, LLC company nor Tuscany Suites & Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino company nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino company nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tuscany Suites & Casino company employs more people globally than Gem Casino Travel, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tuscany Suites & Casino nor Gem Casino Travel, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H