Comparison Overview

Turning Point Foundation

VS

Center Point, Inc.

Turning Point Foundation

620 E Thompson Blvd, Ventura, California, 93001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Turning Point Foundation is a Non-profit, community based organization dedicated to the recovery of persons with mental illness living in Ventura County. Our mission is to provide shelter, housing, rehabilitation, recovery and support services to adults disabled by mental illness reach their highest potential and become contributing members of the community, Our programs include Housing First Homeless 2 Home Street Outreach program, Our Place Safe Haven Shelter, Supported Transitional and Permanent Housing programs, Mental Health Rehabilitation Programs, Peer Support Wellness Centers and Quality of Life Improvement Peer Support Board and Care program.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center Point, Inc.

135 Paul Drive, San Rafael, CA, 94903, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Center Point Inc (CPI) is a not-for-profit organization incorporated in 1971, and since then has grown to become one of the State of California leading providers in the area of substance abuse treatment with programs across Northern California, Oklahoma. CPI works with homeless individuals, veterans, substance users, women with children, parolees, probationers and it also supports clients in recovery trough continuing care and aftercare services. Center Point offers a wide range of treatment options and social services for at risk individuals and underserved and diverse populations. These services include assessment and evaluation, outpatient and residential programs, transitional housing, permanent housing, job training, vocational programs, case management, special women’s services, and programs that serve women with children. Please take the time to visit our web pages to learn more about us and the important services that we offer.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 328
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turning-point-foundation.jpeg
Turning Point Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-point-inc-.jpeg
Center Point, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turning Point Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center Point, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turning Point Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center Point, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Turning Point Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turning Point Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center Point, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center Point, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turning-point-foundation.jpeg
Turning Point Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-point-inc-.jpeg
Center Point, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Turning Point Foundation company and Center Point, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Center Point, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Turning Point Foundation company.

In the current year, Center Point, Inc. company and Turning Point Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center Point, Inc. company nor Turning Point Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center Point, Inc. company nor Turning Point Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center Point, Inc. company nor Turning Point Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Turning Point Foundation company nor Center Point, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Turning Point Foundation company nor Center Point, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center Point, Inc. company employs more people globally than Turning Point Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turning Point Foundation nor Center Point, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H