Comparison Overview

Turner Technology

VS

Graphiant

Turner Technology

12844 Augusta Avenue, Omaha, NE, 68144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.theturnerway.com

To put it simply, we’re a technology integration company that puts people ahead of technology. We listen to you and your needs before we offer any solutions. We talk about processes before processors. Frankly, we respect the fact that your business is unlike any other in your market. You have your own set of goals, challenges and opportunities. And we will help you integrate technology that’s designed and programmed to meet those goals, overcome those challenges and maximize your opportunities. We pride ourselves on providing reliable, personalized service to make sure you’re getting the most from your solution.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Graphiant

1940 Zanker Rd, 50, San Jose, California, US, 95112
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.graphiant.com

Graphiant is a Silicon Valley-based provider of next-generation Edge services. Graphiant has developed the Graphiant Network Edge, an “as-a-Service” solution that provides connectivity between the enterprise WAN, hybrid cloud, network edge, customers, and partners. Graphiant’s Network Edge combines MPLS-like performance (guaranteed delivery and privacy) and Internet-class agility to enable network architects to build enterprise-grade networks at the speed of business.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turnertechnology.jpeg
Turner Technology
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphiant.jpeg
Graphiant
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turner Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graphiant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turner Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphiant in 2025.

Incident History — Turner Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graphiant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphiant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turnertechnology.jpeg
Turner Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphiant.jpeg
Graphiant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Turner Technology company and Graphiant company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Graphiant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Turner Technology company.

In the current year, Graphiant company and Turner Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graphiant company nor Turner Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graphiant company nor Turner Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graphiant company nor Turner Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Turner Technology company nor Graphiant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Turner Technology company nor Graphiant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphiant company employs more people globally than Turner Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turner Technology nor Graphiant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References