Comparison Overview

Turner Labels

VS

Washington Direct Mail

Turner Labels

112 Commerce Drive, Nicholasville, KY, 40356, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We understand the important role labels contribute to building brand equity and consumer trust. We vested in efficient printing press & exuberant embellishments while holding strong as an industry leader in printing with innovative label design. Our premium quality and dedication to satisfying our customers' visions are why we have stood out in such a competitive industry for over 50 years. With a variety of materials, inks and specialty embellishments, we are uniquely positioned in the label conversion industry to achieve the look and feel our customers want, distinguishing their products and establishing brand recognition, all in an efficient and timely manner. Our team of graphic designers, quality assurance pressman and customer service representatives are personally invested in delivering superior end-to-end service and support that goes well beyond delivering superior products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Washington Direct Mail

Kingsway South, Team Valley, Gateshead, GB, NE11 0SH
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

WDM... We Do More Direct Mail - Design - Printing - Finishing - Data Management We do more to help customers across the UK achieve the results they want by combining excellent preparation with rigorous attention to detail and pride in a job well done. WDM is still a family owned and family run business and we believe in quality. The quality that runs throughout the business is evidenced by our ISO9001 and 14001 OHSAS18001 environmental management certification. We will continue to adapt to changing customer and market needs, driving efficiency to build on the reputation we have worked so hard to create. WDM is built on trust, teamwork and great people. We’ll always do more to deliver for the customers we know and the ones we haven’t met yet.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turner-labels.jpeg
Turner Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-direct-mail.jpeg
Washington Direct Mail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turner Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington Direct Mail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turner Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington Direct Mail in 2025.

Incident History — Turner Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington Direct Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington Direct Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turner-labels.jpeg
Turner Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-direct-mail.jpeg
Washington Direct Mail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington Direct Mail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Turner Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Washington Direct Mail company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Turner Labels company.

In the current year, Washington Direct Mail company and Turner Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington Direct Mail company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington Direct Mail company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington Direct Mail company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Turner Labels company nor Washington Direct Mail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Turner Labels company nor Washington Direct Mail company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Turner Labels company employs more people globally than Washington Direct Mail company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor Washington Direct Mail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N