Comparison Overview

Turner Labels

VS

POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio

Turner Labels

112 Commerce Drive, Nicholasville, KY, 40356, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://turnerlabels.com/

We understand the important role labels contribute to building brand equity and consumer trust. We vested in efficient printing press & exuberant embellishments while holding strong as an industry leader in printing with innovative label design. Our premium quality and dedication to satisfying our customers' visions are why we have stood out in such a competitive industry for over 50 years. With a variety of materials, inks and specialty embellishments, we are uniquely positioned in the label conversion industry to achieve the look and feel our customers want, distinguishing their products and establishing brand recognition, all in an efficient and timely manner. Our team of graphic designers, quality assurance pressman and customer service representatives are personally invested in delivering superior end-to-end service and support that goes well beyond delivering superior products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio

834 Ceres Ave, Los Angeles, California, 90021, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://fineartprinting.la

The POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio offers a wide range of fine art and custom printing solutions. Our goal is to be the premier location for Photographic and Fine Art Printing in Los Angeles. Our staff will work one on one with you to manage each step of your project and ensure that all options are explored and no details are missed. At POV, we approach each and every project individually and help you select the right process for your needs… We definitely have you covered in terms of fine art printing and fine art reproduction.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turner-labels.jpeg
Turner Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/povevolving-fine-art-printing-studio.jpeg
POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turner Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turner Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Turner Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turner Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turner-labels.jpeg
Turner Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/povevolving-fine-art-printing-studio.jpeg
POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Turner Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Turner Labels company.

In the current year, POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company and Turner Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company nor Turner Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Turner Labels company nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Turner Labels company nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Turner Labels company employs more people globally than POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turner Labels nor POVevolving Fine Art Printing Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References