Comparison Overview

Turkish Airlines

VS

Lufthansa Group

Turkish Airlines

-, Istanbul, TR, 34149
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.turkishairlines.com

Turkish Airlines has soared to new heights since its first flight in 1933, becoming the airline that connects more countries than any other. Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the world-class service, comfort, and innovative travel experience we offer, designed to elevate every journey. With a diverse team of professionals from around the world, we are proud to be a truly global company, bringing together different perspectives and expertise to deliver an unparalleled travel experience. Powered by an expansive and unrivaled network, we bridge continents and cultures, providing a seamless and premium journey that reflects our passion for aviation. Each flight carries the promise of comfort and the prestige of flying under the Turkish flag, with a dedication to delivering the best to our passengers. Our story is one of continuous growth, driven by a commitment to inspire new discoveries, and set the standard for global air travel.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 37,233
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lufthansa Group

Airportring, Frankfurt, -, 60546, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://lufthansagroup.com

The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, on the one hand, the network airlines Lufthansa German Airlines, SWISS, Austrian Airlines and Brussels Airlines. As part of the multihub strategy, they offer their passengers a broad range of flights from their global hubs in Frankfurt, Munich and Zurich as well as their national hubs in Vienna and Brussels. Lufthansa German Airlines also includes the regional airlines Lufthansa CityLine, Air Dolomiti and Eurowings Discover, the Lufthansa Group’s holiday airline. Besides the network airlines, Eurowings also belongs to the Passenger Airlines segment. This airline provides a comprehensive range of point-to-point connections for European short-haul destinations, in particular from German-speaking countries. Besides its Passenger Airlines business segment, the Lufthansa Group also comprises aviation services. This includes the Logistics, MRO and Catering segments in particular. The Lufthansa Group also includes the Additional Businesses and Group Functions. These comprise Lufthansa Aviation Training and Lufthansa Systems especially.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 54,173
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turkish Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lufthansa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turkish Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2025.

Incident History — Turkish Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turkish Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lufthansa Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Turkish Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lufthansa Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Turkish Airlines company.

In the current year, Lufthansa Group company and Turkish Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Turkish Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Turkish Airlines company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Turkish Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Turkish Airlines company nor Lufthansa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lufthansa Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Turkish Airlines company.

Lufthansa Group company employs more people globally than Turkish Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Lufthansa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References