Comparison Overview

Turkish Airlines

VS

Air France

Turkish Airlines

-, Istanbul, TR, 34149
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.turkishairlines.com

Turkish Airlines has soared to new heights since its first flight in 1933, becoming the airline that connects more countries than any other. Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the world-class service, comfort, and innovative travel experience we offer, designed to elevate every journey. With a diverse team of professionals from around the world, we are proud to be a truly global company, bringing together different perspectives and expertise to deliver an unparalleled travel experience. Powered by an expansive and unrivaled network, we bridge continents and cultures, providing a seamless and premium journey that reflects our passion for aviation. Each flight carries the promise of comfort and the prestige of flying under the Turkish flag, with a dedication to delivering the best to our passengers. Our story is one of continuous growth, driven by a commitment to inspire new discoveries, and set the standard for global air travel.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 37,233
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Air France

45 , rue de Paris, None, Roissy CDG, None, FR, 95747
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.airfrance.com

Depuis 1933, la compagnie Air France porte haut les couleurs de la France à travers le monde entier. Avec une activité, répartie entre le transport aérien de passagers, le fret, la maintenance et l’entretien aéronautique, Air France est un acteur majeur du secteur aérien. Plus de 45 000 collaborateurs se mobilisent au quotidien pour proposer à chaque client, une expérience de voyage unique. Air France, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines et Transavia forment le Groupe Air France-KLM. Le Groupe s’appuie sur la force de ses hubs de Paris-Charles de Gaulle et d’Amsterdam-Schiphol pour offrir un vaste réseau international. Son programme de fidélité Flying Blue rassemble plus de 17 millions d’adhérents. Air France et KLM sont membres de l’alliance SkyTeam qui compte au total, 19 compagnies aériennes. Air France place la santé et la sécurité de ses clients et de ses personnels au cœur de ses préoccupations. Avec Air France Protect, son engagement sanitaire, la compagnie a instauré les mesures sanitaires les plus strictes pour un voyage en toute sécurité. Air France s’est fixé des objectifs ambitieux en matière de développement durable et travaille à réduire et compenser ses émissions de CO2. Dans le cadre du programme Horizon 2030, la compagnie s’est engagée à réduire de 50% ses émissions de CO2 par passager-kilomètre d’ici à 2030 à travers des investissements importants en faveur du renouvellement de sa flotte par des avions de nouvelle génération, l’utilisation de solutions innovantes pour réduire sa consommation de carburant ou encore l’utilisation progressive de carburants alternatifs durables. Plus d'informations sur : corporate.airfrance.com

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 29,688
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/air-france.jpeg
Air France
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Turkish Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Air France
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turkish Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Air France has 61.29% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Turkish Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turkish Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Air France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/air-france.jpeg
Air France
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI-Amplified Social Engineering, Third-Party Customer Service Platform Exploitation, Voice Cloning, Deepfake Impersonation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Monetization, Identity Theft, Loyalty Program Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party service provider compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Turkish Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Air France company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Air France company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Turkish Airlines company has not reported any.

In the current year, Air France company has reported more cyber incidents than Turkish Airlines company.

Neither Air France company nor Turkish Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Air France company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Turkish Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Air France company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Turkish Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Turkish Airlines company nor Air France company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Air France company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Turkish Airlines company.

Turkish Airlines company employs more people globally than Air France company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Turkish Airlines nor Air France holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References