Comparison Overview

The Turek Law Firm, PC

VS

Charles Injury Law

The Turek Law Firm, PC

9595 Six Pines Drive, The Woodlands, Texas, 77380, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Turek Law Firm, PC is a technology driven law firm that serves healthcare providers and businesses. TLF’s real-world, business experience enables strategic thinking at a level not commonly found in a law firm. Further, our innovative business model and robust technology keeps us connected, proactive, secure and responsive. Learn how we can help you with the following: + Healthcare Legal Services + Employment Legal Services + Business Transaction (M&A) Legal Services

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charles Injury Law

930 S State Road 7, Plantation, 33317, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Charles Injury Law is a personal injury law firm that offers personal injury representation throughout Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties. Its managing attorney, Steve Charles, Esq. is admitted to the Florida Bar and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This firm specializes in personal injury, car accident, truck accident, slip & fall and premise liability. We offer affordable rates that fit any budget. Services are available in English, Creole, French and Spanish.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turekdevore-pc.jpeg
The Turek Law Firm, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Turek Law Firm, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charles Injury Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Turek Law Firm, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Injury Law in 2025.

Incident History — The Turek Law Firm, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Turek Law Firm, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charles Injury Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Injury Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turekdevore-pc.jpeg
The Turek Law Firm, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
Incidents

FAQ

The Turek Law Firm, PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles Injury Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charles Injury Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Turek Law Firm, PC company.

In the current year, Charles Injury Law company and The Turek Law Firm, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor The Turek Law Firm, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor The Turek Law Firm, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor The Turek Law Firm, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC company nor Charles Injury Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Turek Law Firm, PC company employs more people globally than Charles Injury Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Turek Law Firm, PC nor Charles Injury Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X