Comparison Overview

Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc.

VS

Cofertility

Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc.

1801 E Main St, None, Tupelo, Mississippi, US, 38804
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Mission To provide a safe and nurturing environment where children needing care can heal and thrive while discovering the love of Jesus Christ. Vision To be a leader in residential care by exemplifying excellence and glorifying Christ. Values - CARE Compassion Compassion is defined as being conscious of others’ distress and possessing a desire to alleviate it. It is the foundation of the service provided at TCM. When called upon, TCM will work diligently to assist the child and family in addressing identified challenges without judgment, ridicule, or blame. Through our compassionate approach, children and families will feel empowered to overcome their obstacles, find hope in seemingly hopeless situations, and discover the unfailing love of Jesus Christ. Accountability At TCM, we believe accountability is the ultimate key to success for our employees, children, and families. Accountability promotes clear expectations and responsibility while creating order. Through policies and processes, accountability is a vital aspect of TCM's overall operations. Respect We believe every human being should be treated with respect. At TCM, we understand and appreciate the diversity of cultures, ideals, and circumstances experienced by those we serve. We believe respect is about showing humility and sensitivity to those differences. We also believe respect promotes cooperation and integrity, creating healthy connections that lead to growth and healing. We want to ensure that every child is taught that respect is also personal. We should respect ourselves and make choices that enhance our well-being, avoiding choices that cause us physical or emotional harm. Excellence As an organization founded upon the principles of pure religion, we believe that every role at TCM should be performed with excellence, bringing glory to our Jesus Christ. We promote excellence in care, education, therapy, etc.; “let it be done for God and not for man” (Colossians 3:23).

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cofertility

Los Angeles, 90005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Cofertility is a human-first fertility ecosystem rewriting the egg freezing and egg donation experience. Our Freeze platform enables women to freeze their eggs for free when they donate half of the eggs to a family that otherwise can’t conceive. For intended parents pursuing egg donation, our Family platform serves as a more transparent, ethical egg donor matching platform. We are obsessed with improving the family-building journey — today or in the future — and are in an endless pursuit to make these experiences more positive.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tupelo-childrens-mansion.jpeg
Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cofertility.jpeg
Cofertility
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cofertility
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cofertility in 2025.

Incident History — Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cofertility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cofertility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tupelo-childrens-mansion.jpeg
Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cofertility.jpeg
Cofertility
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cofertility company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cofertility company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company.

In the current year, Cofertility company and Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cofertility company nor Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cofertility company nor Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cofertility company nor Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company nor Cofertility company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company nor Cofertility company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cofertility company employs more people globally than Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tupelo Children’s Mansion, Inc. nor Cofertility holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H