Comparison Overview

Tuke Institute

VS

Council on Hemispheric Affairs

Tuke Institute

Virtual, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

A translational, action-research organisation to define and promote health-effective medical services, civil capacity-building, and public participation in the design and governance of medical services. It focuses on bridging the gap between the reality of illness and the medical and scientific services that are provided to help people get well and stay well. The Institute is unique in relying significantly on the guidance of scientists, clinicians, and other providers who themselves have chronic illnesses.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Council on Hemispheric Affairs

2501 Calvert St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20008, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1975, the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA), a nonprofit, tax-exempt independent research and information organization, was established to promote the common interests of the hemisphere, raise the visibility of regional affairs and increase the importance of the inter-American relationship, as well as encourage the formulation of rational and constructive U.S. policies towards Latin America.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuke-institute.jpeg
Tuke Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-hemispheric-affairs.jpeg
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tuke Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tuke Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council on Hemispheric Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — Tuke Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tuke Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Council on Hemispheric Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council on Hemispheric Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuke-institute.jpeg
Tuke Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-on-hemispheric-affairs.jpeg
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tuke Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Council on Hemispheric Affairs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Council on Hemispheric Affairs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tuke Institute company.

In the current year, Council on Hemispheric Affairs company and Tuke Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Council on Hemispheric Affairs company nor Tuke Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Council on Hemispheric Affairs company nor Tuke Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Council on Hemispheric Affairs company nor Tuke Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tuke Institute company nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tuke Institute company nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Tuke Institute company and Council on Hemispheric Affairs company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tuke Institute nor Council on Hemispheric Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X