Comparison Overview

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

VS

Washington State University

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

1 Kneeland St Boston, Massachusetts 02111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

With four campuses in Massachusetts, Tufts is a research university committed to helping students and faculty generate bold ideas, innovate, and become active citizens of the world. Tufts' unique combination of research and liberal arts attracts students, faculty, and staff who thrive in an environment of curiosity, creativity and engagement. Tufts University School of Dental Medicine offers one of the most forward-looking educational environments in dental medicine in the country. Since its founding in 1868, Tufts Dental School has been committed to excellence in education, research, patient care and community service.

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Washington State University

Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Washington, 99164, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Washington State University is a nationally recognized land-grant research university, founded in Pullman in 1890. WSU’s statewide system includes campuses in Pullman, Spokane, Everett, Tri-Cities and Vancouver, with extension and research offices in every county of the state, and a nationally ranked online program. WSU is well known for its programs in veterinary medicine, agriculture, engineering, architecture, global animal health, food science, plant science, business, human health, pharmacy, neuroscience, communications, biofuels, sleep, business, education, energy. And, WSU athletics teams compete in the NCAA’s Pac-12 Conference.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,227
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tufts-university-school-of-dental-medicine.jpeg
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington State University in 2025.

Incident History — Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tufts-university-school-of-dental-medicine.jpeg
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Washington State University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company.

In the current year, Washington State University company and Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington State University company nor Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington State University company nor Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington State University company nor Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company nor Washington State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Washington State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company.

Washington State University company employs more people globally than Tufts University School of Dental Medicine company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tufts University School of Dental Medicine nor Washington State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H