Comparison Overview

Tudor Rose

VS

EBONY Media

Tudor Rose

Tudor House, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5RA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Tudor Rose is a marketing, publishing and design agency established in 1997, and has a track record of successful projects, happy customers, and profitability. Each of our employees offers unique skills and perspectives that combine to provide results of the highest quality. The company has an abundance of energy and common sense, and individuals that achieve excellence in their craft. This creates a working environment that breeds brilliance. Clients range from the world's largest organisations - such as the United Nations and Microsoft - who engage Tudor Rose to help them deliver against their marketing strategies, to small start-up businesses for whom we can deliver the entire marketing function.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EBONY Media

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since 1945, the iconic EBONY brand has been the leading authority for chronicling all facets of Black American life - not only the tragedies and traumas but the community’s joys and triumphs. With new ownership and leadership, the rebirth of EBONY is resulting in a platform that will be bold in delivering news and information into a digital ecosystem that will celebrate Black culture and lift Black lives through a variety of diverse channels, while paying homage to the legacy of its past. At EBONY, we are committed to uplifting the Black family unit so we, as Black people, can accomplish anything and everything. You are beloved to us. You are responsive and reflective, informative and intelligent, and we desire to celebrate our Blackness and our culture with you. Follow us: @EBONYMagazine on Instagram| @EBONYMag on Facebook

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-rose.jpeg
Tudor Rose
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebony-magazine.jpeg
EBONY Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tudor Rose
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EBONY Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tudor Rose in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EBONY Media in 2025.

Incident History — Tudor Rose (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tudor Rose cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EBONY Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EBONY Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-rose.jpeg
Tudor Rose
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebony-magazine.jpeg
EBONY Media
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tudor Rose company and EBONY Media company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, EBONY Media company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tudor Rose company.

In the current year, EBONY Media company and Tudor Rose company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EBONY Media company nor Tudor Rose company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EBONY Media company nor Tudor Rose company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EBONY Media company nor Tudor Rose company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tudor Rose company nor EBONY Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tudor Rose company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EBONY Media company.

EBONY Media company employs more people globally than Tudor Rose company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tudor Rose nor EBONY Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.