Comparison Overview

Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers

VS

Avalon

Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers

Level 8, 300 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers is a specialist legal practice located in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. We pride ourselves on being an energetic firm of young practitioners, who are results focused, concentrating on delivery of quality advice, as quickly as possible. Our lawyers are accessible to clients directly, and as necessary. The firm focuses on the following areas of practice:- •Commercial Litigation •Insolvency •Commercial Cowen Schwarz Marschke and its principals are all consistently ranked in the Leading Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Leading Insolvency & Reconstruction Lawyers in Doyle’s Guide to the Australian Legal Profession. Cowen Schwarz Marschke’s principals have been recognised internationally in the Legal 500 (Asia Pacific), Australia’s Best Lawyers and Asia Law. Our firm participates in the Queensland Law Society Limitation of Liability Scheme, a scheme approved under the Professional Standards Act 2004 (Qld). Cowen Schwarz Marschke is a member of the MSI Global Alliance of boutique law and accounting firms. Please visit http://www.csmlawyers.com.au/msi-global-alliance/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Avalon

undefined, National, US, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Achieve more, every day, by shifting a variety of critical business functions – including litigation support, eDiscovery, digital forensics, paper discovery, managed review and cybersecurity – to the experts at Avalon. Our hyper-responsive team members take the time to understand the challenges you face, offer solutions to help you build your business, and provide the best customer service in the industry. Through our vast capabilities in an array of service lines, Avalon successfully services more than 3,000 law firms and corporations, spanning a variety of industries and categories, each year. Our primary goal is to provide the support you need, so your organization succeeds.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 241
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tucker-&-cowen-solicitors.jpeg
Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avalon-document-services.jpeg
Avalon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Avalon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avalon in 2025.

Incident History — Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Avalon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avalon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tucker-&-cowen-solicitors.jpeg
Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avalon-document-services.jpeg
Avalon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avalon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Avalon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company.

In the current year, Avalon company and Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Avalon company nor Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Avalon company nor Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Avalon company nor Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company nor Avalon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Avalon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company.

Avalon company employs more people globally than Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cowen Schwarz Marschke Lawyers nor Avalon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X