Comparison Overview

ts

VS

MSA Engineering Systems Limited

ts

151 El_Hegaz St, Heliopolies, Cairo, Cairo, 11234, EG
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Techno-Serve is a new multi-team organization that is expected to lead and drive the industry in the Egyptian market from the traditional reactive performance era to a proactive and reliable manufacturing one, using Hi-tech equipment and most qualified engineers in the field. Its concept is to create a tailor made quality performance equation for each customer, a performance that is called the “3E Performance” which means the " Effective , Efficient & Economic operation. We are simply one of a few company has certified as SKF MAINTENANCE PARTNER based on our team capabilities in the predictive maintenance field that we are one of the top service provider in Egypt also we are SKF tools authorized supplier

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,841
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MSA Engineering Systems Limited

3 Assured Drive, Thurmaston, LE4 8BB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

MSA Engineering Systems is a world leader in the design and manufacture of patented electrofusion wire laying systems for the production of electrofusion fittings used to join thermoplastic pipes. MSA supplies specialised production equipment, tooling and technology for the manufacture of electrofusion pipe fittings from 20mm to 2000mm. In addition, MSA Engineering Systems design and manufacture test and measurement equipment for leather processing, including the ST300 Softness Tester, and SG300 Substance Gauge. MSA Materials Handling design and manufacture telescopic fork and cam lift systems, typically for automotive and logistics industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ts.jpeg
ts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msa-engineering-systems-limited.jpeg
MSA Engineering Systems Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MSA Engineering Systems Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ts in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSA Engineering Systems Limited in 2025.

Incident History — ts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MSA Engineering Systems Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSA Engineering Systems Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ts.jpeg
ts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msa-engineering-systems-limited.jpeg
MSA Engineering Systems Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MSA Engineering Systems Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MSA Engineering Systems Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ts company.

In the current year, MSA Engineering Systems Limited company and ts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MSA Engineering Systems Limited company nor ts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MSA Engineering Systems Limited company nor ts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MSA Engineering Systems Limited company nor ts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ts company nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ts company nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ts company employs more people globally than MSA Engineering Systems Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ts nor MSA Engineering Systems Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H