Comparison Overview

Circle

VS

Apollo Hospitals

Circle

60 Chelsea Piers, NEW YORK CITY, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.circleengage.ai

Strong

AI platform designed to bridge the gap between benefit providers, health companies, and the communities they serve. From your systems to your workflows, messaging, and data, Circle creates a connected experience for youโ€”and a seamless experience for your members. Reach New Customers: Locate untapped markets, help decide where member recruitment efforts should be focused and marketing dollars invested. Identify Revenue Opportunities: Track usage, persistency, benefit utilization, propensity to buy, churn, and other data points to uncover hidden opportunities for success. Streamline Processes: Customize integrations with current member enrollment and benefit activation to track customer life cycle. Circle believes in making health care more accessible and understandable for vulnerable populations. We believe in a comprehensive approach ensuring that every individual can navigate the health system with ease. From signing up for the right health insurance to using it and building relationships with health plans and providers, we break down silos and unify data across member touch points.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Apollo Hospitals

21, Greams Lane,, Off Greams Road,, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN, 600006
Last Update: 2025-09-28 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://www.apollohospitals.com

Driven by the vision of its Chairman, Dr. Prathap C. Reddy, the Apollo Hospitals Group pioneered corporate healthcare in India. Apollo revolutionized healthcare when Dr Prathap Reddy opened the first hospital in Chennai in 1983. Today Apollo is the worldโ€™s largest integrated healthcare platform with over 10,000 beds across 73 hospitals, over 6000 pharmacies and over 2500 clinics and diagnostic centers as well as 500+ telemedicine centers. Since its inception, Apollo has emerged as one of the world's premier cardiac centers, having conducted over 300,000+ angioplasties and 200,000+ surgeries. Apollo continues to invest in research to bring the most cutting-edge technologies, equipment and treatment protocols to ensure patients have the best available care in the world. Apolloโ€™s 100,000 family members are dedicated to bringing you the best care and leaving the world better than we found it.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 35,962
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trusty-care.jpeg
Circle
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theapollohospitals.jpeg
Apollo Hospitals
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Circle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apollo Hospitals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Circle in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Apollo Hospitals has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Circle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Circle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Apollo Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apollo Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trusty-care.jpeg
Circle
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theapollohospitals.jpeg
Apollo Hospitals
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS, API Vulnerabilities, Employee Credential Theft, System Exploits, Cloud Attacks
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Disruption of Services, Espionage (Potential)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Circle company and Apollo Hospitals company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Apollo Hospitals company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Circle company has not reported any.

In the current year, Apollo Hospitals company has reported more cyber incidents than Circle company.

Neither Apollo Hospitals company nor Circle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Apollo Hospitals company nor Circle company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Apollo Hospitals company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Circle company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Circle company nor Apollo Hospitals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Circle company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Apollo Hospitals company.

Apollo Hospitals company employs more people globally than Circle company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tipray ๅŽฆ้—จๅคฉ้”็ง‘ๆŠ€่‚กไปฝๆœ‰้™ๅ…ฌๅธ Data Leakage Prevention System ๅคฉ้”ๆ•ฐๆฎๆณ„้œฒ้˜ฒๆŠค็ณป็ปŸ 1.0. Impacted is the function doFilter of the file findDeptPage.do. Performing manipulation of the argument sort results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-10-05
Updated
Date
2025-10-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Vanderlande Baggage 360 7.0.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api-addons/v1/messages. Such manipulation of the argument Message leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-10-05
Updated
Date
2025-10-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was found in qianfox FoxCMS up to 1.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php/Search of the component Search Page. The manipulation of the argument keyword results in cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-10-05
Updated
Date
2025-10-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in UTT HiPER 840G up to 3.1.1-190328. Affected by this issue is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formTaskEdit. The manipulation of the argument txtMin2 leads to buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-10-05
Updated
Date
2025-10-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in CodeCanyon/ui-lib Mentor LMS up to 1.1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component API. Executing manipulation can lead to permissive cross-domain policy with untrusted domains. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-10-05
Updated
Date
2025-10-05
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References