Comparison Overview

True Anthem

VS

Google

True Anthem

25 Taylor St., San Francisco, CA, 94102, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

True Anthem is an AI-Powered Content Distribution Platform for media companies and publishers. Clients use our Platform to drive significant increases in monetization by efficiently distributing their most popular stories across social media. We pioneered the use of artificial intelligence to identify the right content for social audiencesโ€”and then automatically post it at the right time. Unlike legacy scheduling tools and manual social media processes, the resulting increases in traffic, revenue and efficiency, typically result in a 300% lift in ROI for our clients. We partner with local media and global news organizations including Tribune, Hearst, and Reuters; feature publishers such as Meredith, and online giants including CBS Interactive. True Anthem is based in San Francisco, California. Find out more and request a demo at trueanthem.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, None, Mountain View, CA, US, 94043
Last Update: 2025-08-10 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we can build for everyone. Check out our career opportunities at goo.gle/3DLEokh

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 314,945
Subsidiaries: 52
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trueanthem.jpeg
True Anthem
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
True Anthem
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Google
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for True Anthem in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google has 3025.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” True Anthem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

True Anthem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trueanthem.jpeg
True Anthem
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Memory Allocator Manipulation, Heap Spraying, Dangling Pointer Dereference, Function Pointer Overwrite, Virtual Function Table Corruption, Race Conditions in Multithreaded Code, Callback-Based Object Lifetime Exploitation, JavaScript Engine Manipulation (e.g., Chrome FileReader), Pointer Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Arbitrary Code Execution, Privilege Escalation, Data Corruption, Bypassing Security Mitigations (DEP, ASLR, CFI), Exploit Development for Malware Distribution, Targeted Attacks on Browsers/OS/Critical Infrastructure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability in the Linux HFSC queuing discipline
Motivation: Security Research and Bounty
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both True Anthem company and Google company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Google company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas True Anthem company has not reported any.

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than True Anthem company.

Google company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while True Anthem company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one data breach, while True Anthem company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while True Anthem company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while True Anthem company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to True Anthem company.

Google company employs more people globally than True Anthem company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.