Comparison Overview

True Label, Inc.

VS

Tamper Technologies Ltd

True Label, Inc.

946 Kane St, Toledo, Ohio, 43612, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.truelabel.com

True Label, Inc. specializes in multi-color, prime labels serving primarily the chemical and health care markets. Capabilities include: flexographic printing up to 8 colors, variable data, 2D bar coding, digital printing, 200% electronic digital inspection for pharmaceutical labeling and on-line proofing with proprietary Approval-link software. True Label has developed a TQM system using Aboutthree software.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tamper Technologies Ltd

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://tampertech.com/

Tamper Technologies is a specialist, security label and tape manufacturer with a proven base of expertise in printing, adhesives, silicone release technology and converting, with a rapidly expanding network of approved distributors throughout the world. ISO 9001 2015 approved. Tamper Technologies, is a leading manufacturer of security tamper evident labels and tapes, won the prestigious Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2010 in the International Trade category and the Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2015 for Innovation. TamperTech’s range of security tapes and tamper evident labels add to the security of cartons, crates, polythene bags, packaging and boxes worldwide. Tamper Technologies success as a manufacturer of tamper evident solutions ensures we provide customers with both standard and customer specific solutions depending upon their requirements. We provide a fast turnaround and quality products. TamperTech offer a range of overt and covert security tape and label solutions, please contact us to find out more

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-label-inc-.jpeg
True Label, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
True Label, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tamper Technologies Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for True Label, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tamper Technologies Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — True Label, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

True Label, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tamper Technologies Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tamper Technologies Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-label-inc-.jpeg
True Label, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

True Label, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tamper Technologies Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tamper Technologies Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to True Label, Inc. company.

In the current year, Tamper Technologies Ltd company and True Label, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither True Label, Inc. company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither True Label, Inc. company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tamper Technologies Ltd company employs more people globally than True Label, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References