Comparison Overview

True Label, Inc.

VS

KGK Genix

True Label, Inc.

946 Kane St, Toledo, Ohio, 43612, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

True Label, Inc. specializes in multi-color, prime labels serving primarily the chemical and health care markets. Capabilities include: flexographic printing up to 8 colors, variable data, 2D bar coding, digital printing, 200% electronic digital inspection for pharmaceutical labeling and on-line proofing with proprietary Approval-link software. True Label has developed a TQM system using Aboutthree software.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KGK Genix

East Road , Harlow, Essex, CM20 2SX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

KGK Genix is a multidisciplinary retail design agency, delivering high-impact retail graphics, point of sale displays, and seamless retail installations. Specialising in large format printing, we create visually striking display solutions that elevate brand presence in the retail environment. With a legacy deeply rooted in large format print, we have evolved into a versatile and forward-thinking agency. Our team combines creativity, innovation, and expertise to provide end-to-end solutions—from conceptual design to final installation. Whether it's crafting immersive retail displays, producing custom signage, or executing complex installations, we bring your brand's vision to life with precision and care. At KGK Genix, we work with some of the world’s leading brands, constantly pushing the boundaries of what's possible with new technologies and production techniques. Client satisfaction is at the heart of everything we do, and we pride ourselves on delivering unrivalled service and exceptional results. Let us help you transform your retail space with exceptional retail graphics and expert print solutions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 138
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-label-inc-.jpeg
True Label, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genix.jpeg
KGK Genix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
True Label, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KGK Genix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for True Label, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KGK Genix in 2025.

Incident History — True Label, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

True Label, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KGK Genix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KGK Genix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-label-inc-.jpeg
True Label, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genix.jpeg
KGK Genix
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both True Label, Inc. company and KGK Genix company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, KGK Genix company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to True Label, Inc. company.

In the current year, KGK Genix company and True Label, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KGK Genix company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KGK Genix company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KGK Genix company nor True Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither True Label, Inc. company nor KGK Genix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither True Label, Inc. company nor KGK Genix company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KGK Genix company employs more people globally than True Label, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither True Label, Inc. nor KGK Genix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N