Comparison Overview

Tropicana Atlantic City

VS

Chumash Enterprises

Tropicana Atlantic City

2831 Boardwalk, Atlantic City, NJ, 08401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Atlantic City’s premier casino resort for more bars, nightlife, fine dining, casual dining, shopping and gambling under one roof. With just under 2,400 hotel rooms in our luxury hotel located on the beach and Boardwalk, the Tropicana Atlantic City is the ideal getaway in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Whether you want to spend the time relaxing in our spas and pools or get in the action with our 24-hour casino, concerts and entertainment you can have it all. After all, don’t you deserve it? NEW! Can't make the trip to see us in Atlantic City? Play our spectacular selection of casino games online at tropicanacasino.com. Must be 21. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 663
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chumash Enterprises

3400 E Highway 246, Santa Ynez, California, 93460, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Chumash Enterprise Overview For thousands of years the Chumash people have made their home in the beautiful Santa Ynez Valley. Their compelling story has created a lasting legacy that we, as an extension of the family, embody through all that we do within the Chumash Enterprise. Our mission, our vision and our values all come from this proud tradition. We are largest employer in Santa Barbara County offering exciting job and career opportunities at all of our properties including Chumash Casino Resort, Chumash Employee Resource Center, Chumash Gas Station, Santa Ynez Tribal Health Clinic, Santa Ynez Chumash Tribal Administration, Hotel Corque, and soon to be the new The Hadsten (Hotel). FREE TO BE ME at Chumash Enterprises! www.ChumashCareers.com

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 573
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tropicana-atlantic-city.jpeg
Tropicana Atlantic City
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chumash-casino-resort-and-hotel-corque.jpeg
Chumash Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tropicana Atlantic City
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chumash Enterprises
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tropicana Atlantic City in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chumash Enterprises in 2025.

Incident History — Tropicana Atlantic City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tropicana Atlantic City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chumash Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chumash Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tropicana-atlantic-city.jpeg
Tropicana Atlantic City
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chumash-casino-resort-and-hotel-corque.jpeg
Chumash Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tropicana Atlantic City company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chumash Enterprises company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chumash Enterprises company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tropicana Atlantic City company.

In the current year, Chumash Enterprises company and Tropicana Atlantic City company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chumash Enterprises company nor Tropicana Atlantic City company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chumash Enterprises company nor Tropicana Atlantic City company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chumash Enterprises company nor Tropicana Atlantic City company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City company nor Chumash Enterprises company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City company nor Chumash Enterprises company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tropicana Atlantic City company employs more people globally than Chumash Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tropicana Atlantic City nor Chumash Enterprises holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H