Comparison Overview

Peaks Recovery Centers

VS

SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC.

Peaks Recovery Centers

1150 Kelly Johnson Blvd, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80920, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Peaks Recovery Centers is a Colorado treatment program offering gender-separate treatment for most adults 18 and older suffering from substance use, co-occurring, and mental health disorders. Our full continuum of care includes individualized programming for Inpatient Detox/Stabilization, Residential Rehab, PHP Day Program, and IOP Programming Levels of Care. Our model of care and proprietary curriculum utilizes inclusive support of each individual's unique walks through recovery. Our mission is to save lives, and our vision is to disrupt our industry through quality of care.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC.

1032 Wissler Road, Quicksburg, 22847, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Shen-Paco Industries, Inc. was founded in 1974 as a non-profit community based organization providing day support and employment services to adults with disabilities. Shen- Paco Industries started out small, serving less than 10 individuals in a small building located in New Market. Today the number served has greatly increased. They are proud to say that they serve over 120 individuals between two locations, Shenandoah and Page Counties, and employ 49 passionate employees. Shen-Paco continues to meet the needs of many individuals within each community and the surrounding counties. Shen-Paco Industries, Inc. provides many ongoing and needed supports to individuals with varying degree of disabilities. Shen-Paco Industries, Inc. provides many ongoing and needed supports to individuals with varying degree of disabilities.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-peaks-recovery-center.jpeg
Peaks Recovery Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shen-paco-industries-inc.jpeg
SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peaks Recovery Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peaks Recovery Centers in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. in 2026.

Incident History — Peaks Recovery Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peaks Recovery Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-peaks-recovery-center.jpeg
Peaks Recovery Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shen-paco-industries-inc.jpeg
SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peaks Recovery Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peaks Recovery Centers company.

In the current year, SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company and Peaks Recovery Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers company nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers company nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peaks Recovery Centers company employs more people globally than SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor SHEN-PACO INDUSTRIES, INC. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H