Comparison Overview

Peaks Recovery Centers

VS

Heart Connection Center

Peaks Recovery Centers

1150 Kelly Johnson Blvd, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80920, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://peaksrecovery.com/videos/

Peaks Recovery Centers is a Colorado treatment program offering gender-separate treatment for most adults 18 and older suffering from substance use, co-occurring, and mental health disorders. Our full continuum of care includes individualized programming for Inpatient Detox/Stabilization, Residential Rehab, PHP Day Program, and IOP Programming Levels of Care. Our model of care and proprietary curriculum utilizes inclusive support of each individual's unique walks through recovery. Our mission is to save lives, and our vision is to disrupt our industry through quality of care.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Heart Connection Center

2499 Glades Road, Boca Raton, Florida 33431, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.heartconnectioncenter.com

Welcome to Heart Connection Center. We are a comprehensive counseling center comprised of a team of dedicated licensed therapists who specialize in providing help to children, teens, adults, and couples located in central Boca Raton, Florida. We work with you to enhance your ability to experience a deeper connection with yourself and others. We believe this connection and understanding will lead you to trusting yourself and finding your authentic voice and own happiness. Through our work together, you will find a balance between caring for yourself and others, leading to feeling fulfilled in your personal life and relationships. Moreover, through couples counseling partners will find a deeper connection together and will build skills for remaining close and satisfied. Therapy is also provided in Spanish for our Spanish-speaking clients.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-peaks-recovery-center.jpeg
Peaks Recovery Centers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heart-connection-center.jpeg
Heart Connection Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Peaks Recovery Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heart Connection Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peaks Recovery Centers in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heart Connection Center in 2026.

Incident History — Peaks Recovery Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peaks Recovery Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heart Connection Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heart Connection Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-peaks-recovery-center.jpeg
Peaks Recovery Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heart-connection-center.jpeg
Heart Connection Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Heart Connection Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peaks Recovery Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Heart Connection Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Peaks Recovery Centers company.

In the current year, Heart Connection Center company and Peaks Recovery Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Heart Connection Center company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Heart Connection Center company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Heart Connection Center company nor Peaks Recovery Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers company nor Heart Connection Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers company nor Heart Connection Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peaks Recovery Centers company employs more people globally than Heart Connection Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Peaks Recovery Centers nor Heart Connection Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References