Comparison Overview

Triple Eight

VS

Newton Running Company

Triple Eight

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

NYC IS IN OUR DNA. Ever ollie over a 6 ft pothole while swerving around an oncoming taxi? Ever bike through miles of snarling traffic, oblivious tourists and millions of testy commuters? Triple Eight was born on the streets of New York City, so we know what it’s like to ride them. And we know what it takes to conquer them, too. Back in 1996, we hit the pavement—literally—with our first helmet, and have been developing tough, stylish protective gear for the action sports industry ever since. Our team is continuously dreaming up new products, incorporating new technology, and maintaining our hard earned reputation for skate, bike, snow, water and derby gear of the highest quality and craftsmanship. After all, we’re not only making the products, we’re using them too. You can be confident that no matter what spills you take, we’re here to help you get right back up. So go ahead, push harder, go faster, fly higher. And know that whatever you ride, Triple Eight has you protected from head to toe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newton Running Company

1375 Walnut St., Suite 100, Boulder, Colorado, 80302, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We exist so that every stride is better. Founded in Boulder, Colorado by a group of runners and coaches, Newton Running is the leading Natural Running footwear brand. Using patented Action/Reaction™ technology, Newton Running shoes help runners achieve a more efficient running form. In addition to its devotion to help people run better, Newton Running is dedicated to reducing the environmental impact of its products and is committed to be a responsible corporate citizen through the support of numerous charitable organizations. Newton Running shoes are available at hundreds of specialty retails across the country and around the world, or at www.newtonrunning.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-eight.jpeg
Triple Eight
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-running-company.jpeg
Newton Running Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Triple Eight
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newton Running Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triple Eight in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newton Running Company in 2025.

Incident History — Triple Eight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triple Eight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newton Running Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newton Running Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triple-eight.jpeg
Triple Eight
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newton-running-company.jpeg
Newton Running Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Triple Eight company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newton Running Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newton Running Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Triple Eight company.

In the current year, Newton Running Company company and Triple Eight company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Triple Eight company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Triple Eight company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newton Running Company company nor Triple Eight company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Triple Eight company nor Newton Running Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Triple Eight company nor Newton Running Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Newton Running Company company employs more people globally than Triple Eight company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Triple Eight nor Newton Running Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H