Comparison Overview

Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd

VS

Agricultural Engineers Association

Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd

17 Southfork Dr, Kilsyth South, 3137, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Trimatt is a leading supplier of solutions tailored to Card Manufacturers/finishers, printers, packaging companies, security printers and fulfillment businesses. Our solutions encompass Inkjet, gluing, labelling, product handling, Vision systems, folding, inspecting, matching, attaching, polywrapping, Inserting and more. Our brands include, Trimatt CardLine 7000, ValidForm, i-card, Multifeeder, FoldLine, KAS, Trimatt ColourStar, PaperWrap,

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Agricultural Engineers Association

62 Forder Way, Peterborough, undefined, PE7 8 JB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Agricultural Engineers Assiciation (AEA) is a trade association representing manufacturers and importers of agricultural machinery and outdoor equipment (horticulture, professional and leisure grass care, and forestry). The AEA was established in 1875 to promote the technical, trade and commercial interests of British manufacturers and suppliers of agricultural machinery. Since then it has championed the cause of manufacturers of agricultural machinery and more recently outdoor power equipment. Today its members cover a broad spectrum of manufacturers of land based equipment from combine harvesters to secateurs and everything in between. A subsidiary of the AEA is the National National Sprayer Testing Scheme (NSTS) who will also be present on the AEA's stand. This scheme has been part of UK agriculture since 2003 and is a main pillar of the Voluntary Initiative. NSTS tested sprayers are a requirement of the UK crop assurance scheme and supermarket protocols and NSTS satisfies the sprayer testing requirements of the Sustainable Use Directive.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trimatt-systems-pty-ltd.jpeg
Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agricultural-engineers-association.jpeg
Agricultural Engineers Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Agricultural Engineers Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agricultural Engineers Association in 2025.

Incident History — Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Agricultural Engineers Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agricultural Engineers Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trimatt-systems-pty-ltd.jpeg
Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agricultural-engineers-association.jpeg
Agricultural Engineers Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Agricultural Engineers Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Agricultural Engineers Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company.

In the current year, Agricultural Engineers Association company and Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Agricultural Engineers Association company nor Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Agricultural Engineers Association company nor Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Agricultural Engineers Association company nor Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company nor Agricultural Engineers Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company nor Agricultural Engineers Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Agricultural Engineers Association company employs more people globally than Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trimatt Systems Pty Ltd nor Agricultural Engineers Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H