Comparison Overview

Trigger Design Inc.

VS

Big Monocle

Trigger Design Inc.

424 Treat Ave, San Francisco, California, 94110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Trigger Design delivers the tools our clients need to create change, spur innovation and build enthusiasm. At Trigger Design our philosophy is to make the connection with your customers stronger, pure and simple. We guide our clients to identify what differentiates their business from their competitors and create communications that give them unique, clear, and powerful voices. We work closely with our clients to form relationships, jointly transforming ideas and strategy into deliverables. Whether it’s print, interactive or advertising always expect us to deliver a superior design solution that fits your business needs.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Big Monocle

824 400 W, Salt Lake City, Ut, 8410, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

We’re an award-winning creative agency specializing in brand strategy & architecture, art direction, design and production. Our collaborative sprint process helps everyone from Fortune 100 titans to emerging startups uncover a clear vision for the future and a faster path to market. Find out more and reach out by visiting www.bigmonocle.com

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trigger-design-llc.jpeg
Trigger Design Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-monocle.jpeg
Big Monocle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trigger Design Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big Monocle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trigger Design Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Monocle in 2025.

Incident History — Trigger Design Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trigger Design Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big Monocle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Monocle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trigger-design-llc.jpeg
Trigger Design Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-monocle.jpeg
Big Monocle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trigger Design Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big Monocle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Big Monocle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trigger Design Inc. company.

In the current year, Big Monocle company and Trigger Design Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big Monocle company nor Trigger Design Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big Monocle company nor Trigger Design Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big Monocle company nor Trigger Design Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. company nor Big Monocle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. company nor Big Monocle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Big Monocle company employs more people globally than Trigger Design Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trigger Design Inc. nor Big Monocle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X