Comparison Overview

Triatek

VS

Camus Hydronics, Ltd

Triatek

4487 Park Drive, Norcross, GA, 30093, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since 1985 Triatek has been on the forefront of designing and manufacturing innovative airflow solutions for critical environments. Headquartered near Atlanta, Georgia, Triatek provides end-to-end solutions for healthcare facilities, laboratories, and municipal facilities around the world. Our product line includes Venturi air valves, room pressure controllers, fume hood controllers, remote monitors, sensors, actuators, and more all designed to seamlessly integrate into a facility’s building automation system. HVAC systems are an important component of critical environments, and Triatek’s product line plays a unique role in mitigating the spread of dangerous airborne contaminants and preventing harmful chemicals from re-circulating in the air.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Camus Hydronics, Ltd

6226 Netherhart Rd., Mississauga, L5T 1B7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CAMUS® Hydronics Ltd. is a manufacturer of an extensive line of gas fired high-efficiency copper tube and stainless steel boilers for residential, light commercial, commercial and industrial applications. It operates out of a modern manufacturing facility complete with a state of the art testing lab, engineering department, manufacturing and assembly lines, warehouse and parts depot. With over 75 years of collective experience, the CAMUS® design team of engineers, service and management staff is equipped to lead the way with innovative designs and leading edge technology.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triatek.jpeg
Triatek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camushydronicsltd.jpeg
Camus Hydronics, Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Triatek
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Camus Hydronics, Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triatek in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camus Hydronics, Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Triatek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triatek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Camus Hydronics, Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camus Hydronics, Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/triatek.jpeg
Triatek
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camushydronicsltd.jpeg
Camus Hydronics, Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Triatek company and Camus Hydronics, Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Camus Hydronics, Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Triatek company.

In the current year, Camus Hydronics, Ltd company and Triatek company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Camus Hydronics, Ltd company nor Triatek company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Camus Hydronics, Ltd company nor Triatek company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Camus Hydronics, Ltd company nor Triatek company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Triatek company nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Triatek company nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Camus Hydronics, Ltd company employs more people globally than Triatek company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Triatek nor Camus Hydronics, Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H