Comparison Overview

Tri-Flex Label

VS

Trabon Group

Tri-Flex Label

48 Allen Blvd, Farmingdale, New York, US, 11735
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

For over 30years, Tri-Flex Label has been serving businesses across the nation: allowing them to rise above their competition with high-quality custom labels at affordable prices. We have been family owned and operated since day one which is why it is so natural for us to treat each and every customer with genuine care, honesty & respect. Adding to our growing family everyday, Tri-Flex Label prides itself on putting the customer first and bringing only the best to the table. Our manufacturing facility, conveniently located in Farmingdale, Long Island, houses state of the art production equipment; turning out some of the incredible labels you see on store shelves all across the nation. We stand by our policy of going to all extremes to meet our customers’ needs by building strong relationships, providing fast turnaround times and assisting our customers through all aspects of the order process.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trabon Group

420 E. Bannister Road, Kansas City, MO, 64131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Trabon is a commercial printer with technology solutions and services for managing complex print needs for brands with a national footprint. Trabon serves the restaurant and hospitality industry with a proprietary software, MenuNet, which serves as a central database for all menu content and design elements. Menu versioning, or customization of content, across thousands of locations is made simple with this solution. Trabon's tailored consulting services include process and campaign management, offset and digital printing, and fulfillment and warehousing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-flex-label.jpeg
Tri-Flex Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trabon.jpeg
Trabon Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tri-Flex Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trabon Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tri-Flex Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trabon Group in 2025.

Incident History — Tri-Flex Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tri-Flex Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trabon Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trabon Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-flex-label.jpeg
Tri-Flex Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trabon.jpeg
Trabon Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tri-Flex Label company and Trabon Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Trabon Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tri-Flex Label company.

In the current year, Trabon Group company and Tri-Flex Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trabon Group company nor Tri-Flex Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trabon Group company nor Tri-Flex Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trabon Group company nor Tri-Flex Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tri-Flex Label company nor Trabon Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tri-Flex Label company nor Trabon Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Trabon Group company employs more people globally than Tri-Flex Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tri-Flex Label nor Trabon Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N