Comparison Overview

Trestle Group

VS

Protiviti

Trestle Group

Chamerstrasse 30, Zug, undefined, 6300, CH
Last Update: 2025-05-02 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Trestle Group is an international, boutique consulting firm dedicated to empowering innovators to create the future of their industry. Leveraging our financial services domain expertise in Legal & Compliance, Risk, Operations, Finance and Procurement, alongside technical capabilities in Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, we enable our clients in their digital journeys to create new business models, transform their operations and take full advantage of emerging opportunities. Founded in 2003, Trestle opened its first offices in Switzerland and Germany to support our clients from strategy creation to execution. We differentiate our services by offering an alternative and more personal approach to consulting and delivering concrete working results backed by rich domain knowledge and hands-on experiences. While our industry focus lies within Financial Services, we have successfully worked with over 50 institutions across Banking, non-Bank Financial Services, Telecommunication, IT and Manufacturing sectors in regulatory compliance, sourcing management, process optimization, risk governance, STO/ICO and digital transformation projects. In 2016, we founded 4th-IR (https://www.4th-ir.com) to further expanded our capabilities to include data science & artificial intelligence. Combining our domain expertise and technical capabilities, we are in a unique position to support clients from strategize to implementation. We measure success based on our relationships. Our relationships with our employees, clients, partners and the global community are of utmost importance. We continually strive to ensure that we provide an outstanding team, and at the end of each day we consider how we have made a difference, where we have improved things โ€“ and what is yet to be achieved. Today, the Trestle 4th-IR team is present in Germany, Switzerland, UK, the US and Canada, where we work collaboratively to fulfill our vision of empowering innovators to create the future of their industries.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Protiviti

2884 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park, California, 94025, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Protiviti (www.protiviti.com) is a global consulting firm that delivers deep expertise, objective insights, a tailored approach and unparalleled collaboration to help leaders confidently face the future. Protiviti and its independent and locally owned member firms provide clients with consulting and managed solutions in finance, technology, operations, data, digital, legal, HR, risk and internal audit through a network of more than 90 offices in over 25 countries. Named to the Fortune 100 Best Companies to Work Forยฎ list for the 10th consecutive year, Protiviti has served more than 80 percent of Fortune 100 and nearly 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies. The firm also works with government agencies and smaller, growing companies, including those looking to go public. Protiviti is a wholly owned subsidiary of Robert Half Inc. (NYSE: RHI). ยฉ 2024 Protiviti Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 12,826
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trestle-group.jpeg
Trestle Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protiviti.jpeg
Protiviti
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Trestle Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Protiviti
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trestle Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Protiviti in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Trestle Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trestle Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Protiviti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Protiviti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trestle-group.jpeg
Trestle Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protiviti.jpeg
Protiviti
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Trestle Group company and Protiviti company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Protiviti company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trestle Group company.

In the current year, Protiviti company and Trestle Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Protiviti company nor Trestle Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Protiviti company nor Trestle Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Protiviti company nor Trestle Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trestle Group company nor Protiviti company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Protiviti company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Trestle Group company.

Protiviti company employs more people globally than Trestle Group company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.