Comparison Overview

TrenTyre

VS

Scania Group

TrenTyre

Hertford Office Park, Building J, 90 Bekker Road, Vorna Valley, Midrand Johannesburg, Gauteng 1685, ZA
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

TrenTyre specialises in new multi-branded tyres, retreads, wheels and allied tyre services. We operate through an extensive countrywide branch and retread factory network, on-site facilities and 24/7 call centre, which means we are strategically positioned for our customersโ€™ convenience.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scania Group

Vagnmakarvรคgen 1, None, Sรถdertรคlje, None, SE, SE-151 87
Last Update: 2025-06-17 (UTC)

Strong

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility thatโ€™s better for business, society and our environment. Employing more than 50,000 people in about 100 countries, Scaniaโ€™s research and development is concentrated in Sweden, while production takes place in Europe and South America.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 38,305
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trentyre.jpeg
TrenTyre
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
TrenTyre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scania Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TrenTyre in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Scania Group has 108.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” TrenTyre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TrenTyre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trentyre.jpeg
TrenTyre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TrenTyre company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Scania Group company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Scania Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TrenTyre company has not reported any.

In the current year, Scania Group company has reported more cyber incidents than TrenTyre company.

Neither Scania Group company nor TrenTyre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Scania Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while TrenTyre company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Scania Group company nor TrenTyre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TrenTyre company nor Scania Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Scania Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TrenTyre company.

Scania Group company employs more people globally than TrenTyre company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.